Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Audiometric detection thresholds for older adults with normal and impaired hearing predict recognition of spectrally and temporally degraded speech in speech-modulated noise.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Associations Between Self-Reported Workload and Measures of Speech Recognition in Adults Across the Lifespan.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Assessing Hearing-Related Quality of Life in Adults With Hearing Loss: Validation of the German Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

NF2-related Schwannomatosis Diagnosed Before and After 30 Years of Age: Differences in Disease Presentation and Rates of Positive Genetic Testing.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2026
Same author

Role of Communication Partners in Pre-Cochlear Implant Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Outcomes of a Large-Scale Pilot Hearing Screening Program at an Academic Medical Center.

American journal of medicine open·2026
Same journal

Cost-Effectiveness of Perioperative Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Blood Manganese and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Diet and Lifestyle Program With 3 Medication Approaches for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease Management.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

International Trends in Head and Neck Cancer Mortality.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Dynamic Quality-of-Life Trajectories After Head and Neck Reconstruction.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Smell and Taste Disturbances Among Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Users.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

627

Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation.

James R Dornhoffer1, Priyanka Reddy1, Ted A Meyer1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

JAMA Otolaryngology-- Head & Neck Surgery
|January 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear implantation significantly improves speech recognition for most individuals, but outcomes vary greatly. Individual patient data reveals a more nuanced understanding of post-implantation hearing success beyond group averages.

More Related Videos

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.7K
Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

627
Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.7K
Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

  • Cochlear implantation is effective for hearing loss, but group analyses obscure individual patient variability.
  • Limited data exists comparing individual preoperative aided and postoperative speech recognition after cochlear implantation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess individual changes in speech recognition scores after cochlear implantation.
  • To compare preoperative aided scores with postoperative scores, accounting for measurement error.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study of 323 adults receiving cochlear implants (2012-2017).
  • Analyzed word and sentence recognition scores (quiet and noise) at 6-12 months post-implantation.
  • Compared scores against preoperative aided performance and test measurement error.

Main Results:

  • Most patients (over 78%) showed significant speech recognition improvement beyond measurement error.
  • A small percentage had similar (up to 21.4%) or poorer (1.6%) scores post-implantation.
  • Individual outcomes were highly variable, not fully captured by group means.

Conclusions:

  • Postoperative cochlear implant outcomes are largely encouraging for individuals.
  • Individual patient data is crucial for understanding variable speech recognition results.
  • This approach offers a more complete interpretation of cochlear implant success.