Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Retinal Pigment Epithelium Transplantation in a Non-human Primate Model for Degenerative Retinal Diseases
Published on: June 14, 2021
3D Heads-Up Display vs. Standard Operating Microscope Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Ben Asani1, Jakob Siedlecki1, Benedikt Schworm1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
This study found that 3D heads-up display (HUD) surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment yields outcomes comparable to standard operating microscopes. While initial surgery times may be longer, the three-dimensional HUD platform offers equivalent retinal reattachment rates and visual acuity.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Surgical Technology
- Retina Surgery
Background:
- Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a significant cause of vision loss.
- 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy is a common surgical approach for RRD.
- Advancements in surgical visualization, such as 3D heads-up display (HUD) platforms, are being explored as alternatives to standard operating microscopes (SOM).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and outcomes of 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery for RRD using a 3D HUD system versus a traditional SOM.
- To evaluate key metrics including primary retinal reattachment rate, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) development, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and surgical duration.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study involving 140 patients with primary RRD.
- Patients underwent 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, either with a 3D HUD (NGENUITY) or SOM.
- Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was performed for significant cataracts; minimum follow-up was 2 months.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed between the 3D HUD and SOM groups in terms of age, RRD extent, number of retinal tears, macular involvement, or preoperative BCVA.
- Postoperative outcomes were comparable: primary retinal reattachment rates (88.6% vs. 94.3%), PVR development (12.9% vs. 7.1%), and final BCVA (0.26 vs. 0.21 logMAR).
- The 3D HUD group experienced a significantly longer surgical duration initially (66.2 vs. 61.2 min), but this difference diminished after a learning curve of approximately 35 cases.
Conclusions:
- The 3D HUD platform achieves comparable results to conventional SOM for 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery in RRD patients.
- Key outcomes such as retinal reattachment, PVR incidence, and final BCVA are similar between the two visualization methods.
- An initial learning curve may contribute to slightly longer surgical times with the 3D HUD, but this effect is transient.
More Related Videos
04:16Intraoperative Visualization of Subretinal Injection and Retinal Detachment in Rats
Published on: March 7, 2025
11:03Subretinal Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived-retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells into a Large-eyed Model of Geographic Atrophy
Published on: January 22, 2018