Heart Team/Guidelines Discordance Is Associated With Increased Mortality: Data From a National Survey of
Guy Witberg1,2, Amit Segev2,3, Yaron D Barac4,2
1Department of Cardiology (G.W., H.V.-A., R.K.), Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
Insights
Guideline discordant revascularization for complex coronary artery disease is common and linked to higher mid-term mortality. This occurs more often in elderly patients and those treated at centers without cardiac surgery services.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Practice guidelines recommend the SYNTAX score (SS) for selecting revascularization strategies in complex coronary artery disease.
- Data on implementing these guidelines and the outcomes of discordant revascularization are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the frequency and consequences of guideline-discordant revascularization in real-world complex coronary artery disease patients.
- To identify predictors of guideline discordance and its impact on mid-term mortality.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of a prospective national survey of consecutive patients with complex coronary artery disease.
- SYNTAX score (SS) calculated by a CoreLab; patients categorized by heart team/guideline agreement or discordance.
Main Results:
- 17.3% of 979 patients had guideline-discordant revascularization. Predictors included age, no cardiac surgery service, SS, and prior PCI/MI.
- Thirty-day outcomes were similar, but 3-year mortality was significantly higher in discordant cases (17.6% vs. 8.4%).
Conclusions:
- Guideline discordant revascularization is not infrequent in complex coronary artery disease.
- Discordance is more likely in elderly patients, those with higher SS, and at centers without cardiac surgery.
- Guideline discordant revascularization is associated with increased mid-term mortality.
Background:
Practice guidelines emphasize the role of the SYNTAX score (SS; Synergy Between PCI With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) in choosing between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in cases of complex coronary artery disease. There is paucity of data on the implementation of these recommendations in daily practice, and on the consequences of guideline discordant revascularization.
Methods:
This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective national survey of consecutive real world patients undergoing coronary revascularization for complex coronary artery disease according to decisions of local heart team at each center. SS was calculated at a dedicated CoreLab, and patients were classified as heart team/guidelines agreement/discordant.
Results:
Nine hundred seventy-nine patients (571 percutaneous coronary intervention and 408 coronary artery bypass graft) were included. Mean age was 65 years and the mean SS was 22. Heart team/guidelines discordance occurred in 170 (17.3%) patients. Independent predictors of heart team/guidelines discordance were age, admission to a center with no cardiac surgery service, SS, and previous percutaneous coronary intervention/myocardial infarction. A multivariate model based on these characteristics had a C statistic of 0.83. Thirty-day outcomes were similar in the agreement/discordance groups, however, heart team/guidelines discordance was associated with a significant increase in 3 year mortality (17.6% versus 8.4%; hazard ratio, 2.05; P=0.002) after multivariate adjustment.
Conclusions:
Heart team/guidelines discordance is not infrequent in real world patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing revascularization. This is more likely to occur in elderly patients, those with more complex coronary disease (as determined by the SS), and those treated at centers with no cardiac surgery service. These patients have a higher risk for mid-term mortality.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management


