Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Attitudes and Perceptions of Blenderized Tube Feed Use Among Physicians and Advanced Practice Providers
Kathleen Eustace1, Lillian Cole2, Lauren Hollaway3
1Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Background:
Blenderized tube feeds (BTFs) have increased in popularity among enteral patients and their caregivers as an alternative to commercial formula. Motivations include ingredient flexibility, increased tolerance, and inclusion in family meals. Research has explored the attitudes and perceptions of patients, caregivers, and registered dietitian nutritionists but not those of physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate their attitudes and perceptions of BTFs.
Methods:
A survey created via Research Electronic Data Capture tools was distributed to physicians and APPs to evaluate clinical practice characteristics, experience, knowledge, and perceptions of BTFs.
Results:
Survey response rate was 17.3% (n = 206). Half of respondents reported familiarity with BTFs, but 95% of respondents had received no formal training regarding BTFs. Physicians reported higher levels of confidence in BTF knowledge than APPs. However, the overall level of confidence in BTF knowledge was poor, with a majority of respondents (73.3% [n = 151]) reporting either "not very confident" or "not confident at all." The most perceived benefits included tailoring diet to better fit the patients' needs (70.9% [146]) and psychological benefits (59.2% [122]). Barriers that most concerned respondents included tube occlusions (59.7% [123]) and nutrition inadequacy (47.6% [98]). χ2 Analysis revealed no relationship between type of provider and perceived benefits or barriers.
Conclusion:
A majority of physicians and APPs are willing to support BTF use but lack education or guidance, resulting in poor confidence. Increased familiarity with BTF use and awareness of available education materials are required to help physicians and APPs support patients utilizing BTFs.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Routes of Drug Administration: Enteral
Enteral administration involves drug administration via the mouth in two ways: orally or sublingually.
Unlike sublingually drugs, drugs that are taken orally pass through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and get metabolized by the liver. Once metabolized, the drug is absorbed into the systemic circulation, reaching different body parts via the bloodstream. However, while passing through the stomach,...