Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Polymer Classification: Crystallinity01:21

Polymer Classification: Crystallinity

3.6K
Unlike ionic or small covalent molecules, polymers do not form crystalline solids due to the diffusion limitations of their long-chain structures. However, polymers contain microscopic crystalline domains separated by amorphous domains.
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...
3.6K
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism01:21

Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism

520
Polymorphism refers to the existence of a drug substance in multiple crystalline forms, known as polymorphs. Recently, this term has been expanded to include solvates (forms containing a solvent), amorphous forms (non-crystalline forms), and desolvated solvates (forms from which the solvent has been removed).
Some polymorphic crystals possess lower aqueous solubility than their amorphous counterparts, leading to incomplete absorption. For instance, the oral suspension of Chloramphenicol, which...
520
Polymer Classification: Stereospecificity01:26

Polymer Classification: Stereospecificity

3.0K
Polymerization generates chiral centers along the entire backbone of a polymer chain. Accordingly, the stereochemistry of the substituent group has a significant effect on polymer properties. Polymers formed from monosubstituted alkene monomers feature chiral carbons at every alternate position in the polymer backbone. Relative to the predominant orientation of substituents at the adjacent chiral carbons, the polymer can exist in three different configurations: isotactic, syndiotactic, and...
3.0K
Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers01:08

Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers

2.6K
Step growth polymerization involves bi or multifunctional monomers. Bifunctional monomers react to form linear step growth polymers, whereas multifunctional monomers react to form non-linear or branched polymers.
As the step-growth polymerization involves step-wise condensation of monomers, the molecular weight also builds up eventually. Consequently, high molecular weight polymers are obtained at the late stages of the polymerization, where 99% of monomers have been consumed.
The extent of the...
2.6K
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:27

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

75
Changes in polymorphic forms can significantly influence the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Although the FDA defines pharmaceutical equivalence based on having the same active ingredient, dosage form, and route of administration, it does not automatically disqualify products with different polymorphic forms. This means two products with different polymorphs can still be deemed pharmaceutically equivalent. However, polymorphic differences can affect properties like wettability,...
75
Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution01:10

Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution

4.3K
For any given polymer, the weight average molecular weight (Mw) is higher than, if not equal to, the number average molecular weight (Mn). The only situation in which the weight average molecular weight and the number average molecular weight are equal is when a polymer consists only of chains with equal molecular weight. However, this never happens in a synthetic polymer, since it is difficult to control the polymerization process up to a molecular level with accuracy to a hundred percent.
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Local Maxima in Martensite Start Temperatures in the Transition Region between Lath and Plate Martensite in Fe-Ni Alloys.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Temperature Rise Inside Shear Bands in a Simple Model Glass.

International journal of molecular sciences·2022
Same author

Enhanced dynamics in deep thermal cycling of a model glass.

The Journal of chemical physics·2022
Same author

Rejuvenation in Deep Thermal Cycling of a Generic Model Glass: A Study of Per-Particle Energy Distribution.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

A 3D Analysis of Dendritic Solidification and Mosaicity in Ni-Based Single Crystal Superalloys.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

A Mechanical Analysis of Chemically Stimulated Linear Shape Memory Polymer Actuation.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Synthesis of Programmable Main-chain Liquid-crystalline Elastomers Using a Two-stage Thiol-acrylate Reaction
11:17

Synthesis of Programmable Main-chain Liquid-crystalline Elastomers Using a Two-stage Thiol-acrylate Reaction

Published on: January 19, 2016

22.6K

On the Size Effect of Additives in Amorphous Shape Memory Polymers.

Elias M Zirdehi1, Hakan Dumlu2, Gunther Eggeler2

  • 1Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation (ICAMS), Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Small additive molecules can improve how quickly shape memory polymers recover their original shape. The size of these additives, relative to the polymer, is a key factor, especially near the glass transition temperature.

Keywords:
molecular dynamics simulationsshape memory polymerssize effect of additives

More Related Videos

Shape Memory Polymers for Active Cell Culture
10:53

Shape Memory Polymers for Active Cell Culture

Published on: July 4, 2011

13.7K
Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold
09:37

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Published on: October 23, 2015

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Synthesis of Programmable Main-chain Liquid-crystalline Elastomers Using a Two-stage Thiol-acrylate Reaction
11:17

Synthesis of Programmable Main-chain Liquid-crystalline Elastomers Using a Two-stage Thiol-acrylate Reaction

Published on: January 19, 2016

22.6K
Shape Memory Polymers for Active Cell Culture
10:53

Shape Memory Polymers for Active Cell Culture

Published on: July 4, 2011

13.7K
Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold
09:37

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Published on: October 23, 2015

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Polymer Science
  • Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Small molecules are known to influence polymer dynamics and properties.
  • Shape memory polymers (SMPs) exhibit a unique ability to recover their original shape upon stimulation.
  • Understanding factors that control the recovery rate of SMPs is crucial for their application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of small additive molecules on the structural relaxation and shape recovery of a thermoplastic shape memory polymer.
  • To elucidate the role of additive concentration and additive-to-monomer size ratio in modulating polymer behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Molecular dynamics simulations were employed to model the polymer-additive system.
  • The simulations focused on analyzing structural relaxation and shape recovery dynamics.
  • Key parameters investigated included additive concentration and the size ratio between additives and polymer monomers.

Main Results:

  • Additive concentration showed a monotonic effect on the shape recovery rate within the studied range.
  • A non-monotonic dependence of shape recovery on the additive-to-monomer size ratio was observed, particularly near the glass transition temperature.
  • The size of additive molecules was identified as a critical, previously unrecognized parameter.

Conclusions:

  • The size ratio of additives to polymer monomers is a significant factor in controlling shape memory polymer recovery.
  • This finding offers a novel pathway for tuning the performance of polymer-based shape memory materials.
  • The results highlight the importance of molecular-level design in optimizing functional polymer systems.