Probiotics for Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A Network Meta-Analysis

Isadora Beghetti1, Davide Panizza1, Jacopo Lenzi2

  • 1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, AOU Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Nutrients
|January 13, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Probiotics may prevent necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants. Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12/B94 showed reduced NEC risk, with greater effect in exclusively human milk-fed infants.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal medicine
  • Microbiology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a significant concern in preterm infants.
  • Emerging evidence suggests probiotics may play a role in NEC prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and perform a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating probiotics for NEC prevention in preterm infants.
  • To analyze the differential effect of probiotic interventions based on infant feeding type (exclusively human milk vs. formula).

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and network meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
  • Inclusion of 51 RCTs involving 10,664 preterm infants and 29 probiotic interventions.
  • Subgroup analysis comparing exclusively human milk-fed infants with those receiving formula.

Main Results:

  • Lactobacillus acidophilus LB demonstrated a promising reduction in NEC risk overall (OR 0.03).
  • Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12/B94 was associated with reduced risk of NEC stage ≥2 in both feeding groups.
  • A greater effect size for B. lactis Bb-12/B94 was observed in exclusively human milk-fed infants (OR 0.04) compared to formula-fed infants (OR 0.32).

Conclusions:

  • Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12/B94 may reduce NEC risk in preterm infants, with varying efficacy based on feeding type.
  • The findings highlight a potentially greater benefit in infants fed exclusively human milk.
  • Further research is warranted due to the limited number of trials and population sizes for most probiotic strains.
Abstract