Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Age-related differences in processing unconventional text formats.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

A Parallel Accumulation-Mobility Aligned Fragmentation Strategy Utilizing High-Resolution Ion Mobility for High Performance Proteomics Analysis.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026

Same author

Perceptual similarity and clustering in braille letter recognition.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026

Same author

Replicating the unconscious working memory effect: a multisite Registered Report.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026

Same author

Global remodeling of ADP-ribosylation by PARP1 suppresses influenza A virus infection.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

How time shapes letter position flexibility: Testing positional uncertainty and open bigram accounts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

The tactile Eriksen flanker effect: A time course analysis.

Ana Baciero^1,2, Isabel Uribe³, Pablo Gomez⁴

¹Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain. abaciero@nebrija.es.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

|January 14, 2021

Summary

This study reveals a tactile flanker effect, showing faster responses when tactile stimuli align. This sensory processing differs from visual modality, especially in error response timing.

Keywords:

Eriksen flanker Tactile attention Touch

More Related Videos

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Sensory Perception

Background:

The flanker effect, a well-documented phenomenon in visual attention, describes how distractor stimuli (flankers) influence the processing of a target stimulus.
Understanding cross-modal similarities and differences in attentional mechanisms is crucial for a comprehensive model of human cognition.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the temporal dynamics of the flanker effect within the tactile sensory modality.
To compare the characteristics of the tactile flanker effect with those previously observed in the visual modality.

Main Methods:

Development of a novel tactile flanker task using dot stimuli presented to fingertips.
Target stimuli were presented to the middle finger, with flanker stimuli to the index and ring fingers.
Distributional analyses of response latency data were conducted to assess the flanker effect.

Main Results:

A significant tactile flanker effect was observed, characterized by facilitation in congruent trials compared to incongruent trials.
The magnitude of the tactile flanker effect was greater for slower correct responses (higher quantiles) than for faster correct responses (lower quantiles).
Differences in the effect size between correct and error responses were noted when compared to visual modality findings.

Conclusions:

The tactile flanker effect demonstrates modality-specific temporal dynamics.
Discrepancies in the flanker effect between tactile and visual modalities suggest distinct underlying neural mechanisms.
Further research is needed to fully elucidate the cross-modal principles of attentional processing.