Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Mouse Heterotopic Cervical Cardiac Transplantation Utilizing Vascular Cuffs
Published on: June 23, 2022
Imaging of Cardiac Transplantation: An Overview
Tor Skibsted Clemmensen1, Niels Møller Jensen1, Hans Eiskjær1
1Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Insights
Cardiac imaging aids in detecting heart transplant rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Combining invasive and non-invasive methods offers personalized surveillance for improved patient outcomes after heart transplantation (HTx).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplant Medicine
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Heart transplantation (HTx) is the optimal treatment for end-stage heart failure.
- Graft survival is limited by acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV).
- Histology is the gold standard for rejection diagnosis, but cardiac imaging aids early detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the utility and reliability of cardiac imaging modalities for detecting and monitoring CAV and rejection post-HTx.
- To assess the role of invasive and non-invasive imaging in managing HTx complications.
Main Methods:
- Review of invasive imaging: Coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT).
- Review of non-invasive imaging: Myocardial perfusion imaging, anatomical/structural imaging, functional imaging.
- Evaluation of imaging's role in surveillance and risk stratification.
Main Results:
- Coronary angiography is standard for CAV surveillance but invasive and may underestimate early disease.
- IVUS and OCT detect early CAV lesions missed by angiography.
- Non-invasive modalities offer prognostic information and may guide invasive monitoring.
Conclusions:
- Acute rejection and CAV remain significant challenges after HTx.
- No single imaging modality provides comprehensive graft assessment.
- A combined approach of invasive and non-invasive imaging is recommended for personalized surveillance and risk stratification.
Abstract:
Heart transplantation (HTx) remains the optimal treatment for selected patients with end-stage advanced heart failure. However, survival is limited early by acute rejection and long term by cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Even though the diagnosis of rejection is based on histology, cardiac imaging provides a pivotal role for early detection and severity assessment of these hazards. The present review focuses on the use and reliability of different invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities to detect and monitor CAV and rejection after HTx. Coronary angiography remains the corner stone in routine CAV surveillance. However, angiograms are invasive and underestimates the CAV severity especially in the early phase. Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography are invasive methods for intracoronary imaging that detects early CAV lesions not evident by angiograms. Non-invasive imaging can be divided into myocardial perfusion imaging, anatomical/structural imaging and myocardial functional imaging. The different non-invasive imaging modalities all provide clinical and prognostic information and may have a gatekeeper role for invasive monitoring. Acute rejection and CAV are still significant clinical problems after HTx. No imaging modality provides complete information on graft function, coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion. However, a combination of invasive and non-invasive modalities at different stages following HTx should be considered for optimal personalized surveillance and risk stratification.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...

