Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Marginal Bone Loss around Machined Smooth Neck Implants Compared to Rough Threaded Neck Implants: A Systematic Review
1Department of Stomatology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Purpose:
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of rough threaded neck implants on marginal bone loss, compared to machined smooth neck implants.
Materials And Methods:
Literature searches were performed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library) (up to March 04, 2020), MEDLINE (PubMed) (1966 to March 04, 2020), and EMBASE (1980 to March 04, 2020), and reference lists of relevant manuscripts and relevant systematic reviews. Grey literature was sought using Grey Literature Net-Work Service (www.opengrey.eu) and The Grey Literature Report (www.greylit.org). Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials that compared the effects of machined smooth neck implants versus rough threaded neck implants on marginal bone loss were included. Two review authors selected studies, assessed trial quality, and extracted data from included studies independently. The meta-analysis was carried out with Review Manager v5.3 software that compared marginal bone loss between rough threaded neck implants and machined smooth neck implants.
Results:
This review included 8 manuscripts (2 randomized controlled trials and 6 controlled clinical trials) from 6 clinical studies. The marginal bone loss around the rough threaded neck implants was significantly less than that around machined smooth neck ones (MD: -0.43 mm, 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.22 mm; p < 0.0001). In the subgroup with different platform connections, less marginal bone loss was observed around the rough threaded neck implants with platform switching (MD: -0.67 mm, 95% CI: -0.87 to -0.48 mm; p < 0.00001) or with regular platform (MD: -0.28 mm, 95% CI: -0.39 to -0.18 mm; p < 0.00001). The statistical analysis of the subgroups with functional loading for 3 or 6 months (MD: -0.39 mm; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.18 mm; p = 0.0003) and 1 year or longer (MD: -0.43 mm, 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.22 mm; p < 0.0001) suggested that the rough threaded neck implants helped to reduce marginal bone loss.
Conclusions:
The results of this review suggested that rough threaded neck implants may be helpful in maintaining the amount of marginal bone around implants. Larger sample size, longer follow-up periods and well-conducted randomized controlled trials are necessary to further prove the validity of the findings.
