Cross-comparison of methods for quantifying antibiotic resistance in agricultural soils amended with dairy manure and...

Agricultural soils are often amended with livestock manure, making them a key reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Given that soils are among the most microbially-diverse environments on the planet; effective characterization and quantification of the effects of manure-derived amendments on soil resistomes is a major challenge. This study examined the effects of dairy manure-derived amendments on agricultural soils via two strategies: quantification of anthropogenic ARG markers via qPCR and shotgun metagenomic resistome profiling; and these strategies were compared to a previously published antibiotic resistant fecal coliform dataset. Soil samples were collected throughout a 120 day complete block field experiment to compare the effects of amendment type on antibiotic resistance. Results of all three measurements were consistent with the hypothesis that the application of composted manure reduced antibiotic resistance in soil relative to the application of raw manure, although some differences were noted in comparing the patterns of the three measurements with time. Raw dairy manure-amended soils yielded high sul1 and tet(W) relative abundances on Day 0 (following amendment application), but significantly decreased to background levels by Day 67 (harvest) and Day 120 (study completion). Shotgun metagenomics similarly detected a decrease in the relative abundances of sulfonamide and tetracycline-associated ARGs over time in the raw manure- and compost-amended soils; however, these levels were significantly lower than those estimated by qPCR. Interestingly, although patterns of sulfonamide and tetracycline resistance among culturable fecal coliforms echoed those observed via qPCR and metagenomics; erythromycin resistant coliforms were directly recovered by culture in amended soils, but corresponding ARGs were not detected by qPCR or metagenomics. This study supports both composting and time restrictions as means of reducing the potential for antibiotic resistance in manure to spread via soil application. Results suggest some differences in finer conclusions drawn depending on which antibiotic resistance monitoring target is selected.