Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025
Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
Published on: February 10, 2015
Acromioclavicular joint stabilization with a double cow-hitch technique compared to a double tight-rope: a
Paul Borbas1, Daniele Angelella2, Christoph J Laux2
1Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. paul.borbas@balgrist.ch.
Introduction:
The aim of the present biomechanical study was to evaluate the stability of a novel simple and cost-effective mini-open double cow-hitch suture button technique of acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization in comparison to a well-established double tight-rope technique.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were randomized into two treatment groups. In either a coracoclavicular stabilization with a standard double tight-rope technique (Group 1; n = 6, age 78 years ± 10) or a double cow-hitch with two No. 5 FiberWire strains looped in a bicortical button placed at the bottom of the coracoid process (Group 2; n = 6, age 80 years ± 13). Both techniques were equally augmented with an AC joint cerclage using a FiberTape. All shoulders were tested in a servo-hydraulic material testing machine for elongation/cyclic displacement (in mm) after cyclic loading (70 N cyclical load, 1500 cycles), stiffness (N/mm) and ultimate load to failure (N). The mechanism of failure was recorded. All tests were performed in a previously published testing setup.
Results:
After 1500 cycles, group 2 showed a cyclic displacement of 1.67 mm (SD 0.85), compared to 1.04 mm (SD 0.23) cyclic displacement in group 1 (p = 0.11). The cyclic displacement after AC reconstruction in group 1 was 0.36 mm lower than in the native state with intact ligaments (p = 0.19), whereas the cyclic elongation in group 2 was 0.05 mm higher compared to the native situation (p = 0.87). Stiffness after reconstruction was significantly higher in group 1 compared to the native specimen (p = 0.001), in group 2 it was similar as before the reconstruction (p = 0.64). Ultimate load to failure and stiffness were higher in group 1 with 424 N (SD 237) and 68.6 N/mm (SD 8.2), compared to 377 N (SD 152) and 68 N/mm (SD 13.3) in group 2, without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.69 and 0.89). The most common failure modes were clavicular fractures at the tight rope drill holes (n = 2) and clavicular fractures medially at the fixation site (n = 2) in group 1, and coracoid button break-through (n = 3) and clavicular fractures medially at the fixation site (n = 2) in group 2.
Conclusions:
Stabilization of the AC joint with a novel mini-open double cow-hitch suture button technique resulted in a similar low elongation, high stiffness and ultimate load to failure compared to a double tight-rope technique. This cost-effective technique for AC joint stabilization could demonstrate a sufficient biomechanical stability with especially high stiffness and load-to-failure.
Level Of Evidence:
Biomechanical study.
