Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Avian Influenza Surveillance with FTA Cards: Field Methods, Biosafety, and Transportation Issues Solved
Published on: August 2, 2011
COMPARISON BETWEEN STANDARD ZOO QUARANTINE PRACTICES AND RISK-BASED MANAGEMENT OF ANIMAL TRANSFERS: A RETROSPECTIVE
Kanyon M McLean1, Mandi W Schook2, Geoffrey W Pye2
1The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA, McLean.112@osu.edu.
Abstract:
Beginning 01 January 2016, for all animals transferred into the collection, Disney's Animal Kingdom used a risk-based process that relies on pathogen hazard identification and then assessment and mitigation of the risk for each identified pathogen hazard. Data on morbidity, mortality, and disease introduction was compared for birds transferred in pre- and post-risk-based processes used during the period 2013-2018. When assessing morbidity within 3 mo of acquisition, logistic regression revealed that birds entering "straight to collection" had lower morbidity rates than those entering with either "standard quarantine" or "risk-based standard quarantine" methods (P = 0.032). Mortality within 3 mo of acquisition was not significantly different between straight-to-collection and standard quarantine or risk-based standard quarantine methods (P = 0.40). In addition, no transmissible pathogens of concern were introduced with acquired birds using either method. Implementation of a risk-based approach to animal transfers between zoos and aquariums may be an alternative method that does not pose a greater risk to animal morbidity or mortality while still protecting the collection from disease introduction.
More Related Videos
08:46Rapid Diagnosis of Avian Influenza Virus in Wild Birds: Use of a Portable rRT-PCR and Freeze-dried Reagents in the Field
Published on: August 2, 2011
09:58Environmental Screening of Aeromonas hydrophila, Mycobacterium spp., and Pseudocapillaria tomentosa in Zebrafish Systems
Published on: December 8, 2017