Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025
Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
Relationships between Lower Limb Muscle Characteristics and Force-Velocity Profiles Derived during Sprinting and
Phillip Bellinger, Matthew N Bourne, Steven Duhig
1Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, BELGIUM.
Purpose:
This study aimed to identify the relationships between lower limb muscle characteristics and mechanical variables derived from the vertical (jumping) and horizontal (sprinting) force-velocity-power (FVP) profiles.
Methods:
Nineteen subelite male rugby league players performed a series of squat jumps and linear 30-m sprints to derive the vertical and horizontal FVP profiles, respectively. The theoretical maximal force (F0), velocity (V0), and power (Pmax) were derived from both the vertical (i.e., vF0, vV0, and vPmax) and the horizontal (i.e., hF0, hV0, and hPmax) FVP profiles. Vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris long head, and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and lateralis muscle fascicle length, pennation angle, and thickness were measured using B-mode ultrasonography. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to calculate volumes of major lower limb muscles, whereas proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to quantify the carnosine content of the GM to estimate muscle fiber typology.
Results:
Variation in vPmax was best explained by GM muscle fiber typology (i.e., greater estimated proportion of Type II fibers) and VL volume (adjusted r2 = 0.440, P = 0.006), whereas adductor and vastus medialis volume and GM muscle fiber typology explained the most variation in hPmax (adjusted r2 = 0.634, P = 0.032). Rectus femoris and VL volume explained variation in vF0 (r2 = 0.430, P = 0.008), whereas adductor and vastus medialis volume explained variation in hF0 (r2 = 0.432, P = 0.007). Variations in vV0 and hV0 were best explained by GM muscle fiber typology (adjusted r2 = 0.580, P < 0.001) and GM muscle fiber typology and biceps femoris short head volume (adjusted r2 = 0.590, P < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusion:
Muscle fiber typology and muscle volume are strong determinants of maximal muscle power in jumping and sprinting by influencing the velocity- and force-oriented mechanical variables.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Muscles that Move the Leg
Anterior Compartment
The quadriceps femoris, the most visible muscle of the anterior compartment, is integral for leg extension and thigh flexion. It is formed by merging four distinct muscles — the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, vastus intermedius, and rectus femoris. The quadriceps tendon, a shared tendon of the four quadriceps muscles, is affixed...
01:16Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella
01:20Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
01:28Muscles of the Leg that Move the Foot and Toes
Anterior Compartment
The anterior compartment includes muscles that contribute to the dorsiflexion of the foot. This compartment houses the tibialis anterior, extensor hallucis longus, and extensor digitorum longus muscles....
01:20Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Skeletal Muscles
When an action...
01:24Generation of Action Potential in Skeletal Muscles
Like neurons, muscle cells are also regarded as excitable due to their capacity to change in response to stimuli, primarily due to voltage-gated ion channels embedded in their plasma membranes, which get activated by alterations in the...