Suicide ideation, suicide plan, and suicide attempt among left-behind children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
Guangbo Qu1, Liqin Shu2, Jian Zhang1,3
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Objective:
There are an increasing number of studies that discussed suicide ideation (SI), suicide plan (SP), and suicide attempt (SA) among left-behind children (LBC). However, the prevalence of these indicators of LBC has not been synthesized and the true correlation between these indicators and left-behind status remains unclear.
Methods:
Electronic databases were comprehensively searched, and eligible observational studies were selected to extract useful data. We pooled the rates and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to determine the prevalence of SI, SP, and SA among LBC. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to reflect the association between left-behind status and risk of SI, SP, and SA.
Results:
Among LBC, the pooled prevalence was 18.7% (95% CI: 15.4-21.9) for SI, 6.4% (95% CI: 4.7-8.1) for SP, and 3.1% (95% CI: 2.6-3.6) for SA. Compared to non-LBC, LBC was at higher risk of SI (OR = 1.26), SP (OR = 1.20), and SA (OR = 1.14), but only the effect for SI achieved statistical significance.
Conclusion:
Overall, the prevalence of SI, SP, and SA is common among LBC, and parental migration has a significant impact on the SI of LBC. Intervention plans and programs are urgently needed to prevent suicidality of this vulnerable group.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Bonanno's Theory of Grieving
Resilience
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...

