The Significance of Motor Evoked Potential Changes and Utility of Multimodality Intraoperative Monitoring in Spinal...

Objective The objective of the study is to identify specific population groups that may benefit from intraoperative motor evoked potentials (MEP) and to assess positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) changes during operation by correlating these with postoperative motor outcomes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1,043 consecutive patient cases undergoing spine surgery with and without intraoperative monitoring (IOM) at a single institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. Demographic and clinical outcome data were collected at multiple time points. An MEP amplitude decrease of 50% or greater was correlated with a motor deficit for this study. Results On multivariate analysis, patients with coronary artery disease and who received IOM were more likely to experience no new deficit (p=0.047) than those who did not receive IOM. Additionally, patients with hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) were less likely than those without to experience no new deficit (p=0.001 and p=0.02, respectively). MEP accounted for 244 cases, of which 15 had alert MEP criteria but no deficit for a PPV of 21.05% at day 1 post-operation. Day 7-30 PPV declined to 14.29%, and by day 90, there was no association. Conclusion Among patients in our study with CAD, IOM use was associated with significantly better outcomes. Patients with higher intraoperative blood loss, hyperlipidemia, and those with CAD were at increased risk of new neurological deficit. The use of motor evoked potentials was associated with low sensitivity and low PPV.