Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Positive risk management: Staff perspectives in acute mental health inpatient settings
Daniela Just1,2, Jasper E Palmier-Claus3,4, Sara Tai1
1School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Aims:
To explore inpatient staff's understanding and implementation of positive risk management.
Background:
Risk management is an essential skill for staff working in acute mental health inpatient settings. National policies advocate the use of positive risk management as a form of collaborative, recovery-focused risk management. However, little is known about how staff understand, operationalize, and use positive risk management in practice.
Design:
Qualitative reflexive thematic analysis study.
Methods:
The authors recruited a purposive sample of healthcare professionals working in acute inpatient settings (N = 16) in 2019 across three National Health Service Trusts in the North-West of England. Participants completed semi-structured interviews which were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results:
The analysis generated three themes: (a) within staff barriers; (b) within service user barriers; and (c) delivery in practice.
Conclusion:
Understanding and implementation of positive risk management was dependant on multiple factors, including staffs' beliefs about mental health, levels of worry and anxiety, and amount of experience and seniority. Staff were more likely to use positive risk management with service users that they perceived as being trustworthy and less risky. Use of positive risk management was reliant on the support practitioners received, how able they were to view situations from multiple perspectives, and the degree to which they felt able to prioritize positive risk management.
Impact:
Although staff expressed the desire and intention to practice positive risk management, the current study highlights challenges around operationalization and implementation. The authors discuss the clinical implications of the findings.
More Related Videos
12:22Mindfulness in Motion MIM: An Onsite Mindfulness Based Intervention MBI for Chronically High Stress Work Environments to Increase Resiliency and Work Engagement
Published on: July 1, 2015
08:25Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Obedience
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...