Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention in ischemic heart disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Aziz Rezapour1, Nader Tavakoli2, Sadaf Akbari2
1Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more cost-effective for reducing mortality and improving quality of life in ischemic heart disease than medical therapy (MT). However, MT may be more cost-effective overall, presenting a complex treatment decision.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Ischemic heart disease (IHD) presents acute and chronic forms, managed via revascularization or medical therapy.
- Evaluating the economic burden of IHD treatments is crucial for healthcare policy.
- This study compares the cost-effectiveness of medical therapy (MT) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the economic burden of medical therapy compared to percutaneous coronary intervention in ischemic heart disease.
- To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MT and PCI for IHD management.
Main Methods:
- A two-step approach: systematic review/meta-analysis for effectiveness and societal cost-effectiveness analysis.
- Markov cohort simulation and sensitivity analyses were employed.
- Data analysis utilized RewMan v5 and TreeAge software.
Main Results:
- PCI showed a non-significant trend towards lower mortality (OR 2.23, p=0.02) and similar quality of life (OR 0.91, p=0.34) compared to MT.
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for improving quality of life was $25,320.11, and for mortality reduction was $562,6691.
- Sensitivity analyses indicated model robustness.
Conclusions:
- PCI demonstrates greater cost-effectiveness in reducing mortality and enhancing quality of life for IHD.
- Medical therapy (MT) may present a more cost-effective strategy overall.
- Findings aid health policymakers and clinicians in IHD treatment decisions.
Abstract:
Background: Ischemic heart disease is categorized into two acute and chronic groups, and its treatments include revascularization and medical therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the economic burden of medical therapy compared to percutaneous coronary intervention in ischemic heart disease. Methods: This study has been done in two steps. The first was a systematic review and meta-analysis to measure the effectiveness of two interventions and the second step was a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of society. The data analysis included a meta-analysis and the Markov cohort simulation. RewMan v5 and tree age software were utilized. Uncertainties related to the model parameters were evaluated using one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses. Results: Regarding the effectiveness of interventions, the odd ratio of the quality of life in the medical therapy group (CI: 0.76-1.10) was 0.91 times the PCI group (p=0.34). This rate for mortality in medical therapy (CI: 0.52-9.68) was 2.23 times more than the PCI group; this result was not significant (p=0.02). In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the cost-effectiveness threshold was $ 16,482; ICER in increasing the QoL and reduction in the mortality rate was $ 25320.11 and $ 562.6691, respectively. Regarding the sensitivity analysis, the model was not sensitive in changing parameters in a specific domain. Conclusion: According to this study, PCI is more cost-effective than medical therapy in the reduction of mortality rate and in the field of increasing quality of life. MT strategy is more cost-effective than the PCI. This study considers controversies regarding the most appropriate treatment for patients with ischemic heart disease that is helpful for health policymakers, cardiologists and health managers.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

