Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

MicroRNA-based Regulation of Picornavirus Tropism
Published on: February 6, 2017
Divergent RNA viruses in Macrophomina phaseolina exhibit potential as virocontrol agents
Jing Wang1,2, Yunxia Ni1, Xintao Liu1
1Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Southern Region of North China, Henan Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Control, No.116, Garden road, Jingshui District, Zhengzhou, 450002 Henan Province, PR China.
Abstract:
Macrophomina phaseolina is an important necrotrophic phytopathogenic fungus and cause extensive damage in many oilseed crops. Twelve M.phaseolina isolates with diverse biological phenotypes were selected for a high-throughput sequencing-based metatranscriptomic and bioinformatics analysis to identify viruses infecting M.phaseolina. The analysis identified 40 partial or nearly complete viral genome segments, 31 of which were novel viruses. Among these viral sequences, 43% of the viral genomes were double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), 47% were positive single-stranded RNA (ssRNA+), and the remaining 10% were negative sense-stranded RNA (ssRNA-). The 40 viruses showed affinity to 13 distinct viral lineages, including Bunyavirales (four viruses), Totiviridae (three viruses), Chrysoviridae (five viruses), Partitiviridae (four viruses), Hypoviridae (one virus), Endornaviridae (two viruses), Tombusviridae (three viruses), Narnaviridae (one virus), Potyviridae (one virus), Bromoviridae (one virus), Virgaviridae (six viruses), 'Fusagraviridae' (five viruses), and Ourmiavirus (four viruses). Two viruses are closely related to two families, Potyviridae and Bromoviridae, which previously contained no mycovirus species. Moreover, nine novel viruses associated with M.phaseolina were identified in the family Totiviridae, Endornaviridae, and Partitiviridae. Coinfection with multiple viruses is prevalent in M.phaseolina, with each isolate harboring different numbers of viruses, ranging from three to eighteen. Furthermore, the effects of the viruses on the fungal host were analyzed according to the biological characteristics of each isolate. The results suggested that M.phaseolina hypovirus 2, M.phaseolina fusagravirus virus 1-5 (MpFV1-5), M.phaseolina endornavirus 1-2 (MpEV1-2), M.phaseolina ourmia-like virus 1-3 (MpOLV1-3), M.phaseolina mitovirus 4 (MpMV4), and M.phaseolina mycobunyavirus 1-4 (MpMBV1-4) were only detected in hypovirulent isolates. Those viruses associated with hypovirulence might be used as biological control agents as an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical fungicides. These findings considerably expand our understanding of mycoviruses in M.phaseolina and unvailed the presence of a huge difference among viruses in isolates from different hosts in distant geographical regions. Together, the present study provides new knowledge about viral evolution and fungus-virus coevolution.
More Related Videos
06:44Confocal Imaging of Double-Stranded RNA and Pattern Recognition Receptors in Negative-Sense RNA Virus Infection
Published on: January 26, 2019
06:02Arbovirus Infections As Screening Tools for the Identification of Viral Immunomodulators and Host Antiviral Factors
Published on: September 13, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Viruses with RNA Genomes
RNA Interference
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
Subviral Agents
Experimental RNAi