Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

293
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
293

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eye-tracking enables reliable pain assessment in intubated SCI patients and is not associated with self-appraisals.

Pain management·2025
Same author

How Implicit Sequence Learning and Explicit Sequence Knowledge Are Expressed in a Serial Response Time Task.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same author

The role of selective attention in implicit learning: evidence for a contextual cueing effect of task-irrelevant features.

Psychological research·2024
Same author

Can frequent long stimulus onset ansynchronies (SOAs) foster the representation of two separated task-sets in dual-tasking?

Psychological research·2024
Same author

The Power Is in the Word-Do Laypeople Interpret Descriptors of Dog Emotional States Correctly?

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2023
Same author

Concurrent visual sequence learning.

Psychological research·2023
Same journal

Orthographic Neighbourhood Size Effects in Chinese Character Recognition: Small, Inconsistent, and Theoretically Ambiguous.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

The Role of Different Thoughts in Tacit Coordination and Its Malleability by Interventions.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Prior Beliefs about Volatility on Adaptive Behavior.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Proactive Control of Emotional Information in Adult ADHD.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowledge Gap Illustrations Spark Curiosity.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Centre-of-Mass Confounds Contribute to Familiar Size Stroop Effects with Boger and Firestone's 'Visual Anagrams'.

Journal of cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 19, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.8K

Why Does Dual-Tasking Hamper Implicit Sequence Learning?

Eva Röttger1, Fang Zhao2, Robert Gaschler2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, 28359 Bremen, DE.

Journal of Cognition
|January 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dual-tasking impairs implicit sequence learning by hindering the ability to separate task events. Learning across-task contingencies is necessary before acquiring sequence knowledge, especially when tasks are integrated.

Keywords:
Implicit Sequence LearningMultitaskingPrediction

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.8K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 19, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.8K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.8K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Dual-tasking research often examines limitations in performance when individuals perform two tasks simultaneously.
  • Implicit sequence learning, typically measured by the serial reaction time task (SRTT), can be detrimentally affected by dual-tasking.
  • Previous research suggests that a lack of task separation contributes to dual-task interference in implicit learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the conditions under which implicit sequence learning can be preserved during dual-tasking.
  • To determine the role of across-task contingency learning in acquiring sequence knowledge.
  • To explore how probabilistic pairings between tasks influence sequence learning acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • An 8-element visual-manual SRTT was paired with an auditory-vocal task during a training phase.
  • Three experiments varied the probabilistic pairings between SRTT elements/locations and auditory tones.
  • Sequence learning was assessed under single-task conditions after dual-task training.

Main Results:

  • When SRTT elements were 100% paired with specific tones, only those elements were learned.
  • No sequence learning occurred when SRTT elements were probabilistically (75%-25%) paired with tone identities.
  • Sequence learning remained intact when the probabilistic (75%-25%) pairing applied to SRTT target locations.

Conclusions:

  • Participants can learn sequences in one task during dual-tasking if they first learn the contingencies between tasks.
  • The ability to learn across-task contingencies is crucial for preserving implicit sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
  • Specific patterns of probabilistic association (e.g., location-based) facilitate sequence learning more than others (e.g., element-identity based).