Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

How to Create Conditioned Taste Aversion for Grazing Ground Covers in Woody Crops with Small Ruminants
Published on: April 30, 2016
Grazing of cover crops in integrated crop-livestock systems
A Planisich1, S A Utsumi2, M Larripa1
1Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, C.C. 14, S 2125 ZAA Zavalla, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Abstract:
Conventional agriculture is specializing rapidly into the management of few monoculture crops, threatening crop diversity and questioning the sustainability of extensive cropping systems. The grazing of cover crops in integrated crop-livestock systems could be a feasible biologically based technology to restore crop diversity and mitigate ecological issues in cropping systems. However, there is limited evidence on plausible synergies or trade-offs for the practice, and about how grazing plans could affect the herbage production and services from cover crops. This work assessed the effects of cattle grazing on the primary and secondary production of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in an integrated ryegrass-soybean rotation system. Specifically, the prediction for synergistic effects of cattle grazing on the ryegrass herbage production, residual crop cover and animal performance were tested in a 2-year (2014 and 2015) study comprising a randomized complete block design of four grazing intensity treatments, replicated three times. A no-cattle grazing treatment (NG), used as control, or continuous grazing with Holstein heifers (~220kg live weight) at targeted sward heights of 5, 10, 15 and 20cm (hereafter referred as G5, G10, G15 and G20, respectively) was applied to ryegrass plots. The herbage production and residual herbage cover of ryegrass, and the average daily gain (ADG, kg/day) and live weight gain per hectare (LWG, kg/ha) of heifers were analyzed by ANOVA (P<0.05) and compared by the TukeyHSD test (P<0.05). Regression models were used to estimate relationships between herbage production, animal performance and sward height. The herbage production was 60% higher (P<0.01) for the grazing treatments compared to NG. The residual herbage for G15 and G20 was not different than that for NG and increased linearly as sward heights increased, reaching highest values for G15 and G20. Maximum ADG was 1.10kg/day for ryegrass grazed at a 20.6cm height, whereas maximum LWG was 427kg/ha for ryegrass grazed to a 16.1cm height. The results support the hypothesis for synergistic effects of using annual ryegrass as a dual forage and service cover crop. Moderate grazing intensity to sward height of 12-18cm with continuous stocking led to optimized forage production and utilization by dairy heifers.
More Related Videos
10:19A CO2 Concentration Gradient Facility for Testing CO2 Enrichment and Soil Effects on Grassland Ecosystem Function
Published on: November 21, 2015
11:02The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Integrated Healthcare System
The Soil Ecosystem
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
What are Populations and Communities?