Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

12.0K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
12.0K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.2K
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods01:27

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

880
Estimating microbial growth is essential for understanding population dynamics and environmental adaptations. Indirect methods provide valuable insights by measuring parameters such as turbidity, metabolic activity, and biomass, enabling efficient and reproducible assessments.During exponential growth, microbial cells scatter light proportionally to their biomass, a principle used in turbidity measurements. About one million cells per milliliter produce detectable scattering, which a...
880

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A transparent universal credit system to incentivize peer review.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Does sexual dimorphism reflect sexual antagonism? Covariation of female fitness with brothers' sexual traits and their female homologues in neriid flies.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Drift and dispersal hinder the evolution of facultative asexual reproduction.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2025
Same author

Reproductive Transitions and Sperm Utilisation in a Facultatively Parthenogenetic Stick Insect.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Maternal Provisioning of Offspring With Defence Chemicals in a Facultatively Parthenogenetic Stick Insect.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Can sexual conflict drive transitions to asexuality? Female resistance to fertilization in a facultatively parthenogenetic insect.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
08:52

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

Published on: March 18, 2022

3.3K

A comparison of two methods for estimating measurement repeatability in morphometric studies.

Zachariah Wylde1, Russell Bonduriansky1

  • 1Evolution and Ecology Research Centre School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney NSW Australia.

Ecology and Evolution
|February 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Remounting specimens provides more accurate measurement repeatability estimates in morphometric studies. This method, unlike single-mount remeasurement, better captures measurement error, especially for small traits.

Keywords:
allometrymeasurement errorphenotypeprecisionrepeatability

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.5K
Real Time and Repeated Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Growth in Individual Live Zebrafish Subjected to Altered Electrical Activity
11:41

Real Time and Repeated Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Growth in Individual Live Zebrafish Subjected to Altered Electrical Activity

Published on: June 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
08:52

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

Published on: March 18, 2022

3.3K
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.5K
Real Time and Repeated Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Growth in Individual Live Zebrafish Subjected to Altered Electrical Activity
11:41

Real Time and Repeated Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Growth in Individual Live Zebrafish Subjected to Altered Electrical Activity

Published on: June 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Morphometrics
  • Entomology
  • Measurement science

Background:

  • Measurement repeatability is crucial in morphometric studies to assess measurement error.
  • Current methods of remeasuring mounted specimens may overestimate repeatability by not accounting for all error sources.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare measurement repeatability estimates using single-mount versus remounted specimen methods.
  • To determine if method differences vary by trait size, type, tissue, or sex.

Main Methods:

  • Measured 22 somatic and genitalic traits in the neriid fly *Telostylinus angusticollis*.
  • Calculated repeatability using a single-mount remeasurement method.
  • Calculated repeatability using a remounted specimen method between measurements.

Main Results:

  • Remounted method yielded lower repeatability estimates for all 22 traits compared to the single-mount method.
  • Differences were more pronounced for smaller structures, like genitalic traits.
  • Differences were independent of trait type, tissue, or sex.

Conclusions:

  • Remounting specimens between measurements offers more realistic repeatability estimates than single-mount methods.
  • This improved accuracy is particularly important for small and difficult-to-measure structures in morphometric research.