Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Variability in competitive decision-making speed and quality against exploiting and exploitative opponents.
Benjamin James Dyson1,2,3
1Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, P-217 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada. bjdyson@ualberta.ca.
Slowing decision-making after losses, not speeding up, improves competitive performance. A variable credit system may enhance control against exploitable opponents in games.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Game Theory
Background:
- Previous research suggests post-loss performance declines due to faster decision-making (post-error speeding).
- The relationship between decision speed and quality in competitive contexts requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that slower decision-making enhances performance in competitive scenarios.
- To examine how opponent type and credit systems influence decision-making speed and quality.
Main Methods:
- Experiments 1-3 used a zero-sum game to assess decision-making speed and quality.
- Manipulated opponent type (unexploitable, exploiting, exploitable) and credit systems (none, fixed, variable).
- Variable credit systems were designed to slow decision-making compared to no credit.
Main Results:
- Post-error speeding was confirmed as a cause of poorer decision-making quality.
- Lose-shift behavior was less flexible than win-stay behavior.
- Variable credit systems potentially increased perceived control against exploitable opponents.
Conclusions:
- Slowing decision-making, rather than speeding up after errors, can improve competitive outcomes.
- Understanding temporal dynamics and response interruption is crucial for optimizing decision-making against diverse opponents.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Competition
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Predator-Prey Interactions

