Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Communication Experiences of Patients With Hearing Loss During Hemodialysis Treatment and the Potential Role of Communication Tools: A Qualitative Study.

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease·2026
Same author

"Don't tell me I'm going to feel joy": The emotional burden of informal caregivers of patients with a fragility fracture discharged from a rehabilitation hospital.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same author

An interactive capacity-building workshop for process evaluations of complex interventions in critical care.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2026
Same author

In postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture, romosozumab for 3 mo was noninferior to 12 mo for increasing total hip BMD at 1 y.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Hearing Loss and Communication Difficulty in Hospital and Hemodialysis Care Settings.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Provider Perspectives on Fall Prevention Exercise Services in Ontario: A Qualitative Analysis.

Canadian journal on aging = La revue canadienne du vieillissement·2026
Same journal

The Outcome of Cardiac Hydatid Surgery in The Iraqi Center of Heart Diseases.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Perception of body donation among the Phase-1 medical students, a questionnaire-based study.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Infertility in Saudi Arabia: Qualitative Insights into IVF Treatment Services and Policy Recommendations.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Cyber Military Operations under International Humanitarian Law: Interpreting the Concept of "Attack" and Challenges in Protecting Civilians.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Sentiment Analysis of Acceptance TVET Online Courses on the Skill Academy App from Google Play: Leveraging Text Mining with Comparison Machine Learning Model.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Emotional intelligence: An important skill to learn now more than ever.

F1000Research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 18, 2025

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.8K

Journal editors: How do their editing incomes compare?

Janice C L Lee1, Jennifer Watt1,2, Diane Kelsall3

  • 1University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

F1000Research
|February 5, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found no gender pay gap among journal editors. Remuneration was similar across publishing models, though non-clinician editors and those working more hours earned more.

Keywords:
IncomeJournalMedical JournalismPeer reviewPublishing

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.8K
Methods for Comparing Nutrients in Beebread Made by Africanized and European Honey Bees and the Effects on Hemolymph Protein Titers
08:42

Methods for Comparing Nutrients in Beebread Made by Africanized and European Honey Bees and the Effects on Hemolymph Protein Titers

Published on: March 17, 2015

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 18, 2025

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.8K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.8K
Methods for Comparing Nutrients in Beebread Made by Africanized and European Honey Bees and the Effects on Hemolymph Protein Titers
08:42

Methods for Comparing Nutrients in Beebread Made by Africanized and European Honey Bees and the Effects on Hemolymph Protein Titers

Published on: March 17, 2015

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Publishing
  • Scholarly Communication
  • Journal Editing

Background:

  • Journal editors play a crucial role in producing high-quality scientific literature.
  • Concerns exist regarding potential gender pay gaps in academic and clinical professions, including journal editing.
  • The study addresses the need to investigate editor remuneration and potential disparities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify editor remuneration in core clinical journals.
  • To determine if a gender pay gap exists in journal editing.
  • To assess remuneration differences based on publishing models and journal characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • An online survey was distributed to journal editors from core clinical journals listed in the Abridged Index Medicus.
  • Data collected included editor demographics, income from editorial work, and journal characteristics.
  • Multivariable partial proportional odds models were used for statistical analysis.

Main Results:

  • 140 fully completed surveys were analyzed (95 males, 45 females).
  • No significant gender pay gap was detected.
  • No remuneration difference was found between subscription-based and open access journals.
  • Editors not primarily health care providers (OR 2.96) and those working >10 hours/week (OR 16.7) reported higher incomes.
  • 36% of editors reported no remuneration for their work.

Conclusions:

  • The study did not find evidence of a gender pay gap in journal editing.
  • Remuneration did not differ significantly between subscription and open access publishing models.
  • A substantial portion of editors in core clinical journals remain unremunerated.