Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

05:02
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
32.8K
What Happens to a Published Article if a Cited Article Is Corrected?
James H Lubowitz1, Jefferson C Brand2, Michael J Rossi2
1Editor-in-Chief.
Summary
Scientific literature integrity relies on error correction. Errors in systematic reviews and meta-analyses require immediate correction to maintain accurate research findings.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics
- Scientific Publishing
- Research Integrity
Background:
- Millions of scientific articles are published annually, increasing the likelihood of undetected errors.
- While scientific literature is theoretically self-correcting, proactive error correction is crucial for maintaining integrity.
Discussion:
- Errors in background citations typically do not impact study conclusions.
- However, errors or retractions in citations within systematic reviews and meta-analyses can significantly alter quantitative synthesis results.
Key Insights:
- The self-correcting nature of science is insufficient for maintaining literature integrity.
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are particularly vulnerable to citation errors, impacting their conclusions.
Outlook:
- Corrections for systematic reviews must include revising the meta-analysis and electronically attaching errata.
- Ensuring the accuracy of citations in quantitative research is paramount for reliable scientific evidence.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
6.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
6.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
425
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
425
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
7.2K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
7.2K
Effects of feedback
821
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
821
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
3.9K
3.9K

