Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

11:54
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
Published on: May 8, 2021
4.9K
Considerations in Audio-Visual Interaction Models: An ERP Study of Music Perception by Musicians and Non-musicians
Marzieh Sorati1, Dawn M Behne1
1Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Frontiers in Psychology
|February 8, 2021
Summary
Audiovisual (AV) interaction in music perception influences early brain responses (N1 and P2). Different AV models show varied suppression, but musical experience did not alter this effect, suggesting consistent prediction mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Auditory Perception
- Audiovisual Integration
Background:
- Previous research indicates visual cues predict upcoming sounds, influencing audiovisual (AV) interaction and early auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) like N1 and P2.
- Four AV interaction models exist to analyze these effects, comparing AV stimuli with auditory-only (AO) and video-only (VO) stimuli.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different AV interaction models affect N1 and P2 suppression in music perception.
- To examine if musical experience influences AV interaction and ERP suppression in musicians versus non-musicians.
Main Methods:
- Participants (musicians and non-musicians) were presented with audio-only (AO), audiovisual (AV), video-only (VO), and control (CO) stimuli of a keyboard note.
- N1 and P2 amplitudes and latencies were analyzed across four AV interaction models.
Main Results:
- Different AV interaction models exhibited distinct patterns of N1 and P2 amplitude and latency suppression.
- The choice of AV interaction model significantly impacted the resulting N1 and P2 difference waves.
- Despite musicians showing higher N1 amplitudes in AO perception, N1 and P2 suppression was similar between musicians and non-musicians across AV models.
Conclusions:
- AV interaction models are not interchangeable and yield different results for N1 and P2 suppression.
- Visual cues predicting upcoming sounds in AV music perception lead to similar early ERP suppression in both musicians and non-musicians.
- The findings highlight the complexity of analyzing AV interactions and suggest consistent predictive processing regardless of musical expertise.
Keywords:
audiovisual perceptionauditory perceptionevent-related potential (ERP)music perceptionmusicians and non-musiciansMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Perception
2.3K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.3K
Auditory Perception
788
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
788
Perception of Sound Waves
5.1K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
5.1K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
642
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
642

