State of the Reservoir: Current Concepts of Penile Implant Reservoir Placement and Potential Complications
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
Maia Van Dyke1, Adam S Baumgarten2, Nicolas Ortiz3
1Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Purpose Of Review:
To discuss mechanical and surgical innovations in inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery and their implications on reservoir placement and patient outcomes.
Recent Findings:
The past decade has seen a new emphasis on optimizing outcomes and minimizing complications associated with IPP reservoirs. Innovations in device design have accordingly yielded safer, more durable IPP outcomes over the past four decades. Modifications in surgical approach for reservoir placement abound for both traditional space of Retzius and ectopic reservoir placement techniques. Surgical and medical history, patient anatomy, and patient preference should all be considered when choosing approach for IPP reservoir placement. Prosthetic urologists should be proficient in multiple approaches to provide the best care to their patients.

