Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025
06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.3K
Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation
1Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Plos Computational Biology
|February 8, 2021
Summary
Choice in public resources allows cooperation to thrive. Defectors favor high-quality options, enabling cooperators to succeed in lower-quality groups, maximizing cooperation when resource qualities are similar.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Game Theory
- Behavioral Ecology
Background:
- Cooperation's evolution challenges natural selection due to inherent costs.
- Understanding cooperation mechanisms is a key focus in evolutionary theory.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how choice in public resources facilitates the evolution of cooperation.
- To identify conditions that maximize cooperative behavior in evolutionary models.
Main Methods:
- Developed a simple evolutionary model to simulate interactions within varying public resource scenarios.
- Analyzed the strategic choices of cooperators and defectors based on resource quality.
Main Results:
- Individuals with a choice of public resources can foster cooperation.
- Defectors are predicted to aggregate in the highest quality resources.
- Cooperators can survive and outcompete defectors by utilizing lower-quality resources.
- Cooperation is maximized when the top two resource qualities are nearly equal.
Conclusions:
- Resource choice provides a viable mechanism for cooperation's evolution.
- This model applies to diverse biological and social systems involving collective action.
- Optimal conditions for cooperation involve nuanced resource quality differences.
Related Concept Videos
01:41Social Traps
25.4K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
25.4K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.6K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.6K
02:06Social Exchange Theory
38.3K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
38.3K
01:26Social Exchange Theory
146
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
146
02:34Competition
23.5K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
23.5K
01:37Social Loafing
38.0K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.0K