Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective.
Govert Valkenburg1,2, Guus Dix3, Joeri Tijdink4,5
1Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands. govert.valkenburg@ntnu.no.
Research integrity (RI) requires a deeper look beyond individual and institutional responsibilities. Focusing on specific research practices and cultures offers new ways to foster responsible conduct and avoid vague burdens.
Area of Science:
- Scientific Research
- Ethics in Science
Background:
- Research integrity (RI) discussions typically focus on individual researcher and institutional responsibilities.
- The concept of 'culture and practice' in RI is often treated as a residual category, lacking specific definition.
- Existing frameworks may lead to vague, additional burdens of responsibility for individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a more nuanced understanding of 'culture and practice' within research integrity.
- To explore the relationship between core RI values and specific elements of practice and culture.
- To identify new intervention points for promoting responsible conduct through targeted practices and cultures.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of research integrity, practice, and culture.
- Articulation of key elements within research practices and cultures.
- Examination of the connection between RI values and these elements.
Main Results:
- Identified specific elements of practice and culture relevant to research integrity.
- Demonstrated how RI values are intrinsically linked to these specific practices and cultures.
- Proposed a framework that integrates practice and culture as distinct, actionable components of RI.
Conclusions:
- Fostering research integrity necessitates a focus on specific, context-dependent practices and cultures.
- Moving beyond residual categories allows for more effective interventions in promoting responsible conduct.
- This conceptual framework supports both practitioners and theorists in advancing research integrity.
More Related Videos
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
The Role of Culture
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Ethics and Bioethics
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...