Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models01:17

Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models

138
Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter traditionally defined by compartment models, signifying the rate at which a drug is expelled from the body. However, a noncompartmental model offers an alternative method for assessing clearance, primarily employing empirical data obtained after administering a single drug dose.
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
138
Drug Elimination: The Concept of Clearance01:06

Drug Elimination: The Concept of Clearance

3.4K
Drug elimination refers to removing drugs from the body, either through urine by the kidneys or through bile by the liver. Drug clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter that measures the efficiency of drug removal from the bloodstream within a specific time frame. It is calculated as the rate at which a drug is eliminated from plasma divided by the plasma concentration of the drug.
Drug clearance is not limited to renal excretion but encompasses all organs involved in drug elimination,...
3.4K
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance00:56

One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance

197
Clearance is a key pharmacokinetic parameter that quantifies the volume of body fluid from which a drug is entirely removed within a specific time frame. It is crucial in assessing how a drug is eliminated from the body and has critical clinical applications.
In the one-compartment open model for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, clearance is estimated by dividing the elimination rate by the plasma drug concentration. This equation leverages the elimination rate constant and the apparent...
197
Hepatic Drug Clearance: Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clearance01:09

Hepatic Drug Clearance: Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clearance

330
Hepatic clearance refers to the volume of blood cleared of a drug by the liver per unit of time. It plays a crucial role in drug metabolism and elimination. While hepatic clearance is commonly estimated by subtracting renal clearance from total body clearance, other pathways, such as pulmonary or biliary clearance, may also contribute. However, these pathways are generally less significant than hepatic and renal clearance.
Most drugs undergo restrictive clearance, which is proportional to the...
330
Clearance Models: Compartment Models01:25

Clearance Models: Compartment Models

191
Clearance measures drug elimination from the central compartment, including plasma and highly perfused organs like kidneys and liver. Its calculation varies depending on pharmacokinetic models and administration routes. The one-compartment model, for instance, portrays the pharmacokinetics of polar drugs such as aminoglycoside antibiotics administered intravenously and readily excreted in urine. In this case, clearance is influenced by the terminal rate constant (λz) and the total volume...
191
Renal Clearance01:23

Renal Clearance

2.0K
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a critical marker of kidney function, reflecting the efficiency of filtration by the glomeruli. Renal clearance of specific substances, such as inulin or creatinine, is commonly used to measure GFR.
Renal clearance refers to the volume of plasma cleared of a specific substance, such as creatinine, per unit of time. To measure clearance, urine samples are collected over a 24-hour period during each bladder voiding, followed by a single blood sample at the...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved Clearance Verification: Direct Application of Measurements' Distribution.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Occupational Radiation Exposure in Spine Surgery: Organ-specific OSL Phantom Dosimetry and Workload-based Risk Assessment.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

A dosemeter for the public based on NaCl pellets for use in radiological or nuclear emergencies.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

Dose Simulation for the MATROSHKA-R Experiment onboard the International Space Station Using a High-Fidelity Model of the Zvezda Module.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

Reflecting Local Economic Parameters in ALARA Evaluations for the Reuse of Decommissioning Remaining Building.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

OBITUARYRoger Clarke 1943-2026.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

Radiation protection knowledge among healthcare professionals and students - what (if anything) are studies telling us?

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
07:00

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

8.5K

Improved clearance verification.

Robert A Meck1, Jonatan Jiselmark2,3

  • 1Science and Technology Systems, LLC, 9408 Corsica Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814-2814, United States of America.

Journal of Radiological Protection : Official Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection
|February 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study enhances radioactive clearance calculations by incorporating scenario modeling uncertainties, improving the probability of meeting safety standards. The Monte Carlo method is preferred for more reliable assurance of public protection.

Keywords:
GUMMARSSIMMonte Carloclearancesum of fractionsuncertaintyunity rule

More Related Videos

Novel Passive Clearing Methods for the Rapid Production of Optical Transparency in Whole CNS Tissue
06:14

Novel Passive Clearing Methods for the Rapid Production of Optical Transparency in Whole CNS Tissue

Published on: May 8, 2018

9.1K
Optical Clearing of the Mouse Central Nervous System Using Passive CLARITY
10:28

Optical Clearing of the Mouse Central Nervous System Using Passive CLARITY

Published on: June 30, 2016

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
07:00

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

8.5K
Novel Passive Clearing Methods for the Rapid Production of Optical Transparency in Whole CNS Tissue
06:14

Novel Passive Clearing Methods for the Rapid Production of Optical Transparency in Whole CNS Tissue

Published on: May 8, 2018

9.1K
Optical Clearing of the Mouse Central Nervous System Using Passive CLARITY
10:28

Optical Clearing of the Mouse Central Nervous System Using Passive CLARITY

Published on: June 30, 2016

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Engineering
  • Radiation Safety
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Radioactive clearance assessments are crucial for nuclear waste management and public safety.
  • Current methods may not fully account for uncertainties in scenario modeling.
  • Accurate probability assessments are needed to ensure regulatory standards are met.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of scenario modeling uncertainties on radioactive clearance assessments.
  • To compare the analytical (GUM) and Monte Carlo (MC) methods for calculating the sum of fractions (SOF) inequality.
  • To demonstrate how including uncertainties enhances the assurance of public protection.

Main Methods:

  • Calculation of the sum of fractions (SOF) inequality, incorporating scenario modeling uncertainties.
  • Application of two calculation methods: the analytical approach (GUM) and the Monte Carlo (MC) method.
  • Comparative analysis of results with and without scenario uncertainties.

Main Results:

  • Scenario modeling uncertainties significantly affect the calculated probabilities of meeting clearance standards.
  • The Monte Carlo method provides a preferred approach for incorporating these uncertainties.
  • Inclusion of uncertainties leads to a more robust assessment of safety assurance.

Conclusions:

  • Accounting for scenario modeling uncertainties in SOF calculations is essential for accurate radioactive clearance assessments.
  • The Monte Carlo method offers advantages for handling complex uncertainties in this domain.
  • Improved uncertainty quantification enhances confidence in the protection of the public from radiation exposure.