Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

Pollination and Flower Structure

Pollination and Flower Structure

Flowers are the reproductive, seed-producing structures of angiosperms. Typically, flowers consist of sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. Sepals and petals are the vegetative flower organs. Stamens and carpels are the reproductive organs.

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Waterfall infrasound.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same author

Flag-waving behavior in matador bugs is an antipredatory strategy.

Current zoology·2026

Same author

Phantom oceans restructure bat communities.

Ecology·2025

Same author

Strong bat predation and weak environmental constraints predict longer moth tails.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025

Same author

Wind turbine noise pollution reduces songbird vocal presence through changes in abundance.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2025

Same author

Blended-red lighting partially mitigates the cost of light pollution for arthropods.

Oecologia·2025

Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night

Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night

Published on: December 29, 2021

Noise distracts foraging bats.

Louise C Allen¹, Nickolay I Hristov², Juliette J Rubin³

¹Department of Biological Sciences, Winston-Salem State University, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences

|February 10, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Environmental noise significantly impairs predator hunting success by distracting bats, not just masking prey sounds. This highlights the need to reduce landscape noise pollution for wildlife.

Keywords:

bats distraction foraging behaviour noise predator–prey

More Related Videos

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Published on: October 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night

Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night

Published on: December 29, 2021

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture

Published on: October 23, 2019

Area of Science:

Behavioral Ecology
Bioacoustics
Sensory Ecology

Background:

Predator-prey interactions are crucial for ecosystem stability.
Anthropogenic noise increasingly impacts wildlife, potentially disrupting vital behaviors like hunting.
Understanding how noise affects sensory perception is key to conservation.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the mechanisms by which environmental noise disrupts the hunting behavior of the pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus).
To differentiate between auditory masking and attentional distraction as noise impacts on predator foraging.
To assess the pallid bat's ability to compensate for noise during prey detection.

Main Methods:

Using controlled experiments with band-limited white noise treatments that either spectrally overlapped or did not overlap prey acoustic cues.
Observing and quantifying hunting success, search time, and sonar pulse usage in pallid bats under different noise conditions.
Comparing bat hunting performance in noisy environments versus ambient conditions.

Main Results:

Both overlapping and non-overlapping noise treatments halved successful prey localization.
Search time nearly tripled, and sonar pulse usage increased by 25% in the presence of noise.
Evidence suggests distraction, rather than masking, is the primary driver of reduced hunting efficacy.

Conclusions:

The pallid bat demonstrates limited capacity to compensate for environmental noise during acoustic hunting.
Distraction is a significant factor in noise-induced impairment of predator foraging success.
Mitigation strategies should focus on reducing overall landscape noise levels rather than solely on noise frequency.