Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

07:31
Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
12.1K
Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac
A Azzi1, D Ryangga2, S A Pawiro3
1MSc, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia.
Journal of Biomedical Physics & Engineering
|February 10, 2021
Summary
Air gaps significantly impact radiation dose calculations in head and neck cancer treatments. This study found dose discrepancies, especially with smaller air gaps and larger field sizes, necessitating dose corrections for accurate radiotherapy.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Dosimetry
Background:
- Air cavities and gaps pose significant challenges in dose calculation for head and neck radiotherapy using flattening filter medical linear accelerators (Linacs).
- Accurate dose calculation is critical for effective and safe radiation delivery in complex anatomical regions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of air-gap dose calculation on flattening-filter-free (FFF) small field irradiation.
- To compare dose calculations in the presence of heterogeneities using different algorithms and Monte Carlo simulations.
Main Methods:
- Comparative study using experimental and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to assess air-gap effects.
- Dose distribution simulated on virtual phantoms and patient CT images for open small fields and modulated photon beams.
- Dose ratios calculated using Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and MC for air-gaps versus tissue-equivalent material.
Main Results:
- A linear correlation was observed between the air-to-tissue-equivalent dose ratio and field size (slope: -0.198±0.001 for AAA, -0.161±0.014 for MC).
- Dose ratios below air-gaps were field size-dependent, with AAA to MC dose calculation discrepancies ranging from 1.57% to 5.35%.
- Significant dose discrepancies were noted for patient skin and oral cavity in head and neck cases due to air gaps.
Conclusions:
- The air-to-tissue-equivalent dose ratio decreases with smaller air gaps and larger field sizes.
- Dose correction for AAA calculations is recommended for open small fields following small air gaps.
- Utilizing multiple gantry angles in clinical cases can mitigate the impact of air-gap effects.

