Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
Published on: June 24, 2022
Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for a Technically Challenging Pancreatic Head Cancer
Samer AlMasri1, Alessandro Paniccia1, Amer H Zureikat2,3
1Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Background:
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is performed for resectable periampullary lesions with comparable outcomes to the open approach.1 Surgical therapy for borderline-resectable (BR) pancreatic tumors is technically challenging and poses a significant risk of bleeding and positive margins.2 As experience with RPD grows at high-volume centers, case selection can be carefully expanded to include complex vascular resections.3 We demonstrate a RPD performed for BR pancreatic adenocarcinoma with portal vein (PV) involvement and presence of anomalous hepatic arterial anatomy.
Methods:
A 75-year-old female presented with abdominal pain and obstructive jaundice. She was previously healthy and had a relatively normal body mass index (25.7 kg/m2). Endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography imaging identified a pancreatic head mass measuring 2.3 cm with evidence of concomitant abutment of the PV (90-180 degree) and abutment of a replaced right hepatic artery (rRHA) originating from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Following four cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, restaging imaging demonstrated partial radiographic response, represented by a lesser degree of PV abutment and resolution of rRHA abutment. RPD was performed with side-bite resection of the PV and preservation of rRHA. The video demonstrates the key steps followed in a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy performed for a technically challenging pancreatic head cancer and highlights robotic control of bleeding from the PV and SMA obviating the need for conversion. Histopathology revealed a residual moderately differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma with 4-of-40 positive lymph nodes and negative surgical margins. The tumor was staged as ypT1cN2 (AJCC 8th edition). The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged on hospital day 8.
Conclusion:
In high-volume centers, the robotic approach can be safely used in selected cases of technically challenging BR pancreatic head cancers.

