Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Induced Electric Fields: Applications01:27

Induced Electric Fields: Applications

2.2K
An important distinction exists between the electric field induced by a changing magnetic field and the electrostatic field produced by a fixed charge distribution. Specifically, the induced electric field is nonconservative because it does not work in moving a charge over a closed path. In contrast, the electrostatic field is conservative and does no net work over a closed path. Hence, electric potential can be associated with the electrostatic field but not the induced field. The following...
2.2K
Magnetic Fields01:27

Magnetic Fields

6.7K
A moving charge or a current creates a magnetic field in the surrounding space, in addition to its electric field. The magnetic field exerts a force on any other moving charge or current that is present in the field. Like an electric field, the magnetic field is also a vector field. At any position, the direction of the magnetic field is defined as the direction in which the north pole of a compass needle points.
A magnetic field is defined by the force that a charged particle experiences...
6.7K
Magnetic Field Of A Current Loop01:16

Magnetic Field Of A Current Loop

5.8K
Consider a circular loop with a radius a, that carries a current I. The magnetic field due to the current at an arbitrary point P along the axis of the loop can be calculated using the Biot-Savart law.
5.8K
Determining Electric Field From Electric Potential01:12

Determining Electric Field From Electric Potential

4.8K
The electric field and electric potential are related to each other. If the electric field at various points in the region of interest is known, it can be used to calculate the electric potential difference between any two points. Similarly, if the electric potential is known for various points, then it is possible to calculate the electric field.
In general, regardless of whether the electric field is uniform, it points in the direction of decreasing potential because the force on a positive...
4.8K
Electric Field of Parallel Conducting Plates01:16

Electric Field of Parallel Conducting Plates

1.4K
Gauss' law relates the electric flux through a closed surface to the net charge enclosed by that surface. Gauss's law can be applied to find the electric field and the charge enclosed in a region depending on its charge distribution.
Consider a cross-section of a thin, infinite conducting plate having a positive charge. For such a large thin plate, as the thickness of the plate tends to zero, the positive charges lie on the plate's two large faces. Without an external electric field, the...
1.4K
Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire01:28

Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire

5.7K
Consider an infinitely long straight wire carrying a current I. The magnetic field at point P at a distance a from the origin can be calculated using the Biot-Savart law.
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thalamic deep brain stimulation in traumatic brain injury: a phase 1, randomized feasibility study.

Nature medicine·2023
Same author

Electric field calculation and peripheral nerve stimulation prediction for head and body gradient coils.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2021
Same author

Effect of radiofrequency shield diameter on signal-to-noise ratio at ultra-high field MRI.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2021
Same author

Improved Vim targeting for focused ultrasound ablation treatment of essential tremor: A probabilistic and patient-specific approach.

Human brain mapping·2020
Same author

In Vivo 7T MR Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Reveals Opposite Susceptibility Contrast between Cortical and White Matter Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2016
Same journal

Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Triple-Pulse <sup>23</sup>Na MRI Sequence (TriNa) for Simultaneous Acquisition of Spin-Density-Weighted and Fluid-Attenuated Images.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Design of an 8-Channel Transmit 32-Channel Receive 11.7T Head Coil and Evaluation of SNR Gains.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

The Potential for Absolute Temperature Imaging Based on Brain Metabolites Using an FID-Shifting Approach in Gradient Echo Planar Spectroscopic Imaging (GREPSI).

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Prospective Head Motion Correction in T1- and T2-Weighted Long Echo Train Sequences Using Servo Navigation.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Electric and Magnetic Field Devices for Stimulation of Biological Tissues
13:29

Electric and Magnetic Field Devices for Stimulation of Biological Tissues

Published on: May 15, 2021

5.4K

Minimum electric-field gradient coil design: Theoretical limits and practical guidelines.

Peter B Roemer1, Brian K Rutt2

  • 1Roemer Consulting, Lutz, Florida, USA.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|February 10, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New gradient coil designs minimize electric-field (E-field) exposure by using partially asymmetric solutions. This approach significantly reduces E-field levels, enhancing safety in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures.

Keywords:
E-fieldPNSasymmetric gradientelectric fieldfolded gradientgradient coilhead gradientperipheral nerve stimulation

More Related Videos

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T
10:22

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T

Published on: January 16, 2021

5.7K
How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression
07:00

How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression

Published on: January 23, 2017

24.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Electric and Magnetic Field Devices for Stimulation of Biological Tissues
13:29

Electric and Magnetic Field Devices for Stimulation of Biological Tissues

Published on: May 15, 2021

5.4K
MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T
10:22

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T

Published on: January 16, 2021

5.7K
How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression
07:00

How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression

Published on: January 23, 2017

24.5K

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Physics

Background:

  • Gradient coils are essential for MRI, but they generate electric fields (E-fields) that can pose safety concerns.
  • Optimizing gradient coil design to minimize E-fields while maintaining imaging performance is a critical challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel concepts for minimum electric-field (E-field) gradient design.
  • To determine the achievable reduction in E-field levels without compromising MRI performance.

Main Methods:

  • Integrated efficient induced E-field calculation into gradient design software.
  • Designed gradient coils with minimum E-fields under various geometric constraints and standard magnetic field limitations.
  • Investigated the impact of asymmetry and concomitant fields on E-field-constrained gradient designs for head and body imaging.

Main Results:

  • Symmetric gradient coil designs resulted in high E-fields on shoulders or the head.
  • Partially asymmetric solutions yielded the lowest E-fields, balancing exposure between shoulders and head.
  • Achieved 1.8x to 2.8x reduction in E-field for x- and y-gradient coils, respectively, compared to symmetric designs with identical gradient distortion.

Conclusions:

  • Introduced a generalized method for minimum E-field gradient design.
  • Defined theoretical limits for magnetic energy and peak E-field in gradient coils of arbitrary cylindrical geometry.