Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Comparison of left ventricular longitudinal systolic function parameters in the prediction of adverse outcome in
Anna Gozdzik1, Thomas H Marwick2,3, Monika Przewlocka-Kosmala1,2,3
1Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, Wroclaw, 50-556, Poland.
Insights
Echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal function, particularly global longitudinal strain (GLS) during exercise, significantly predict adverse outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Left ventricular (LV) longitudinal systolic function is crucial for cardiac performance.
- Various echocardiographic parameters assess LV function, but their comparative prognostic value in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prognostic significance of different LV longitudinal function parameters at rest and during exercise in patients with HFpEF.
- To determine if these parameters provide incremental predictive value beyond established clinical and biochemical markers.
Main Methods:
- 201 patients with HFpEF underwent resting and exercise echocardiography, measuring mitral annular plane systolic excursion, systolic tissue velocity (s'), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and global longitudinal strain rate (GLSR).
- Prognostic value was assessed for heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death over a median follow-up of 48 months.
- Cox regression and reclassification analyses were performed, adjusting for clinical variables, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and peak oxygen consumption (VO2).
Main Results:
- Global longitudinal strain (GLS) at rest and during exercise, and GLSR during exercise, were significantly associated with adverse outcomes after multivariable adjustment.
- The addition of exercise GLS and GLSR, and resting GLS, to a base model including clinical factors, BNP, and peak VO2 significantly improved predictive power (Net Reclassification Improvement: 49%, 42%, and 38%, respectively).
- Exercise GLS demonstrated the strongest incremental predictive value, significantly improving the model's c-statistic.
Conclusions:
- Echocardiographic parameters of LV longitudinal function are not equally effective in predicting adverse events in HFpEF.
- LV deformation indices, especially global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessed during exercise, offer the highest predictive utility.
- These exercise-based deformation parameters provide valuable prognostic information incremental to clinical data and BNP levels in HFpEF management.
Aims:
Several different diagnostic parameters can be used to assess left ventricular (LV) longitudinal systolic function, but no studies comparing their predictive value have been conducted. We sought to compare the prognostic value of LV long-axis function parameters at rest and exercise using the population with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Methods And Results:
Clinical and biochemical variables were collected at baseline in 201 patients with HFpEF. Echocardiography was performed at rest and immediately after exercise, with measurement of mitral annular plane systolic excursion, systolic tissue velocity (s'), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and global longitudinal strain rate (GLSR). Participants were followed for 48 (24-60) months for heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death. Seventy-four patients (36.8%) met the study endpoint. Cox regression analysis revealed that after adjustment for Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and peak VO2 , heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death were significantly associated with GLS at rest [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.98; P = 0.016], GLS after exercise (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.77-0.91; P < 0.001), and GLSR after exercise (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.48; P = 0.002). The addition of each of the following: exercise GLS and GLSR and resting GLS to the base model including Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure, BNP, and peak VO2 improved predictive power for the study endpoint [net reclassification improvement (NRI) = 49%, P < 0.001; NRI = 42%, P = 0.004; and NRI = 38%, P = 0.009, respectively]. Exercise GLS was the only longitudinal parameter significantly improving c-statistics of the base model (0.68 vs. 0.73; P = 0.047).
Conclusions:
Echocardiographic parameters of LV longitudinal function are not equipotential in predicting adverse outcomes in HFpEF. LV deformation indices, especially assessed with exercise, show the highest predictive utility independent from and incremental to clinical data and BNP.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

