Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.1K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.1K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

428
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
428
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.8K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

239
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
239
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

920
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
920

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same author

The cognitive mechanisms behind wishful predictions: A diffusion model decomposition.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Association Between Weight Stigma Experiences in Healthcare and Self-Reported Healthcare Avoidance in a National Sample.

Obesity science & practice·2025
Same author

Pneumococcal vaccination knowledge, attitudes, and practices among surveyed U.S. adults aged 19-64 years at increased risk for pneumococcal disease.

Vaccine·2025
Same author

Motivated Interpretations of Survival Rates in Icon Arrays: An Issue of Frequency Format?

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2025
Same author

Correction: Effect of Harm Anchors in Visual Displays of Test Results on Patient Perceptions of Urgency About Near-Normal Values: Experimental Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K

Context dependency in risky decision making: Is there a description-experience gap?

Inkyung Park1, Paul D Windschitl1, Andrew R Smith2

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.

Plos One
|February 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Learning risk from descriptions or experience similarly impacts decision-making. Contextual risk information influences perceptions and behaviors, regardless of how it

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Individuals learn about risks through descriptions or direct experience.
  • The description-experience gap highlights differences in decision patterns based on learning format.
  • Contextual information can influence risk perception and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if learning risk from description versus experience differentially affects context effects in risky decision-making.
  • To examine the direction and magnitude of context effects based on learning format.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments utilized the Decisions about Risk Task (DART) to measure risk-taking tendencies.
  • Participants learned about hazard stimuli either through description or experience.
  • The harm rate of a context hazard was manipulated while a focal hazard's rate remained constant.

Main Results:

  • Contrast effects were observed: participants took more risks with focal hazards when context hazards were high-risk.
  • These contrast effects were consistent in strength regardless of whether risk information was learned from experience or description.
  • Verbal risk assessments also exhibited contrast effects, independent of learning format.

Conclusions:

  • Context plays a significant role in how people assess and decide on hazards, irrespective of learning format.
  • The description-experience gap does not appear to alter the impact of context on risk perception and behavior.
  • Findings suggest a robust influence of contextual cues on risky decision-making.