Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.8K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.6K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.6K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

428
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
428
Introspection01:29

Introspection

96
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
96
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can we train better medical intuition? Exploring the potential of debiasing interventions.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same author

Using large language models to estimate belief strength in reasoning.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Intuitive insight: Fast associative processes drive sound creative thinking.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Humans and LLMs rate deliberation as superior to intuition on complex reasoning tasks.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Moses illusions, fast and slow.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Risky outdoor play in the early years: how are parental and practitioner perceptions of danger and benefits associated with young children's outdoor play experiences?

International journal of play·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.5K

Think slow, then fast: Does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding?

Matthieu Raoelison1, Marine Keime2, Wim De Neys3

  • 1Université de Paris, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, F-75005, Paris, France. matthieu.raoelison@ensc.fr.

Memory & Cognition
|February 12, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Repeatedly engaging in deliberate ("slow") thinking does not improve intuitive ("fast") reasoning performance. This study found that the order of cognitive tasks does not impact fast reasoning accuracy, challenging previous concerns.

Keywords:
Decision-makingDual processMethodologyReasoningTwo-response paradigm

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.8K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.5K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.8K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Decision-Making

Background:

  • The two-response paradigm in cognitive studies often involves alternating between intuitive (fast) and deliberate (slow) thinking.
  • A concern exists that repeated deliberation might artificially enhance fast reasoning performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether repeated deliberation enhances intuitive reasoning.
  • To test the impact of task order (fast-then-slow vs. slow-then-fast) on intuitive reasoning accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed cognitive tasks using a bat-and-ball problem variant.
  • Three groups were tested: fast-then-slow blocks, slow-then-fast blocks, and a mixed-order group.
  • Response times were limited to 4s for fast blocks and 25s for slow blocks.

Main Results:

  • The order in which participants completed fast and slow cognitive blocks did not significantly affect accuracy on the fast trials.
  • This finding held true across all three experimental conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Repeated deliberation does not appear to boost intuitive reasoning performance.
  • The order of cognitive task presentation is not a critical factor in improving fast reasoning accuracy.