A comparison of reverse projection and PhotoModeler for suspect height analysis

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision between the Reverse Projection and PhotoModeler methods for suspect height analysis. Thirty analysts were assigned to measure the heights of three different suspects, one for each method, with the suspects having been recorded standing at three different distances in a scene. For Reverse Projection, the analysts were provided with height scales to place and video-record at the same positions their suspects stood in at the test scene, so that frames could be extracted from the video and overlaid onto frames of the suspects to measure height. For PhotoModeler, analysts calibrated frames of the suspects using 3D point cloud data obtained from a laser scan of the scene, so that measurements could be made in PhotoModeler software. Errors were calculated for the measurements and compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskal-Wallis H-test, which indicated significant differences for errors between the two methods (p = 0.0025 and p = 0.008). Reverse Projection yielded a greater range of error and tended to have higher standard deviations than PhotoModeler, but the overall accuracy between the two methods was found to be comparable. The majority of absolute measurement errors for both methods were less than 2 cm.