Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Detection and Disease Assessment in Real-Time Using M-ROSE
Published on: March 1, 2024
Emergency department methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nare screen effect on pneumonia treatment duration
Anthony J Renzoni1, Gary D Peksa2, Joshua M DeMott2
1Department of Pharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Study Objective:
The objective of this study was to determine if performing a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screen in the emergency department (ED) decreased general medicine patient exposure to anti-MRSA antibiotics for pneumonia.
Methods:
This was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating patients who had a diagnosis of pneumonia and were initiated on anti-MRSA therapy (vancomycin or linezolid) in the ED and subsequently admitted to a general medicine floor. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) did not receive a MRSA nares screen in the ED (No MRSA screen group) or 2) received a MRSA nares screen in the ED (MRSA screen group). The primary outcome was anti-MRSA antibiotic duration. Secondary outcomes included vancomycin level evaluation, hospital survival, and acute kidney injury.
Results:
Of the 116 patients included, 37 patients received a MRSA nares screen in the ED and 79 patients did not. Median duration of antibiotic exposure was similar for both groups (No MRSA screen, 30.5 h [interquartile range (IQR) 20.5-52.5] vs. MRSA screen, 24.5 h [IQR 20.6-40.3]; p = 0.28). Of patients who were screened, 35 were negative and 2 were positive. Secondary outcomes were similar.
Conclusion:
Performing a MRSA nares screen in the ED for patients diagnosed with pneumonia, initiated on anti-MRSA antibiotics, and admitted to a general medicine floor did not decrease duration of anti-MRSA antibiotics. At this time, ED providers do not need to consider a MRSA nasal screen in the ED for patients being admitted to general medicine, although larger studies could be considered.
Insights
Performing a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screen in the emergency department did not reduce the duration of anti-MRSA antibiotic use for pneumonia patients admitted to general medicine. Further research is not recommended at this time.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacy
- Hospital Medicine
Background:
- Pneumonia treatment often involves antibiotics targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
- The utility of routine MRSA nasal screening in the Emergency Department (ED) for patients admitted to general medicine is not well-established.
- Reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure is a key goal in antimicrobial stewardship.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if MRSA nasal screening in the ED impacts the duration of anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy for pneumonia patients.
- To assess the effect of ED MRSA screening on antibiotic exposure in general medicine admissions.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, retrospective study compared patients with pneumonia initiated on anti-MRSA therapy in the ED.
- Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received an ED MRSA nares screen and those who did not.
- Primary outcome was the duration of anti-MRSA antibiotic exposure; secondary outcomes included vancomycin levels, survival, and acute kidney injury.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in median anti-MRSA antibiotic duration was observed between the MRSA screen group (24.5 hours) and the no MRSA screen group (30.5 hours).
- Of the 37 screened patients, only 2 tested positive for MRSA.
- Secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- ED MRSA nasal screening did not decrease the duration of anti-MRSA antibiotic use for pneumonia patients admitted to general medicine.
- Current evidence does not support routine ED MRSA nasal screening for this patient population.
- Larger studies may be considered to further investigate this practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Epistaxis
Etiology
Possible causes of this condition include high blood pressure, trauma, low humidity, upper respiratory tract infections, allergies, foreign bodies, nasal inhalation of corticosteroids or illicit drugs, excessive use of decongestant nasal sprays, facial or nasal surgery, anatomic malformation, tumors, or systemic...
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....

