Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Indicators02:39

Indicators

53.2K
Certain organic substances change color in dilute solution when the hydronium ion concentration reaches a particular value. For example, phenolphthalein is a colorless substance in any aqueous solution with a hydronium ion concentration greater than 5.0 × 10−9 M (pH < 8.3). In more basic solutions where the hydronium ion concentration is less than 5.0 × 10−9 M (pH > 8.3), it is red or pink. Substances such as phenolphthalein, which can be used to determine the pH of a solution, are...
53.2K
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient01:17

Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient

1.3K
The extended Debye-Hückel equation indicates that the activity coefficient of an ion in an aqueous solution at 25°C depends on three partially interdependent properties: the ionic strength of the solution, the charge of the ion, and the ion size. 
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
1.3K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.1K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.1K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

253.6K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
253.6K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.7K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.7K
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods01:27

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

863
Estimating microbial growth is essential for understanding population dynamics and environmental adaptations. Indirect methods provide valuable insights by measuring parameters such as turbidity, metabolic activity, and biomass, enabling efficient and reproducible assessments.During exponential growth, microbial cells scatter light proportionally to their biomass, a principle used in turbidity measurements. About one million cells per milliliter produce detectable scattering, which a...
863

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analysing the level of evidence of publications in the journal Radiología.

Radiologia·2025
Same author

A new year, a new hope.

Radiologia·2025
Same author

A nice coincidence.

Radiologia·2024
Same author

Performance in prognostic capacity and efficiency of the Thoracic Care Suite GE AI tool applied to chest radiography of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Radiologia·2023
Same author

Inter-observer agreement on levels of evidence in radiology articles.

Radiologia·2023
Same author

A crucial year for Radiología.

Radiologia·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.8K

Bibliometric indicators to evaluate scientific activity.

C García-Villar1, J M García-Santos2

  • 1Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España.

Radiologia
|February 17, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reviews bibliometric indicators used to measure scientific output and impact. It details common author-level (like h-index) and journal-level (like impact factor) metrics, discussing their pros and cons.

Keywords:
Bibliometric indicatorsFactor de impactoH-indexImpact factorIndicadores bibliométricosRadiologyRadiologíaÍndice h

More Related Videos

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

590
Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
08:14

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

593

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.8K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

590
Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
08:14

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

593

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientometrics
  • Research Evaluation

Background:

  • Bibliometric indicators are crucial for quantifying scientific production and impact.
  • These metrics are broadly categorized by their unit of analysis: authors or journals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe key bibliometric indicators for scientific research.
  • To explain the calculation methods for these indicators.
  • To discuss the advantages and limitations of various bibliometric tools.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established bibliometric indicators.
  • Explanation of calculation principles for author- and journal-level metrics.
  • Discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of each indicator.

Main Results:

  • Common author-level indicators include the h-index and its derivatives (e-index, h5-index, Ab-index).
  • Prominent journal-level indicators include Impact Factor, Field-Weighted Citation Impact, SJR, SNIP, and CiteScore.
  • The article provides a comprehensive overview of these widely used metrics.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding bibliometric indicators is essential for evaluating scientific research.
  • Each indicator has specific applications, advantages, and limitations that researchers and institutions must consider.
  • This review serves as a guide to navigating the landscape of scientific impact metrics.