Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

10:15
Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013
18.1K
Non-invasive brain stimulation as add-on therapy for subacute post-stroke aphasia: a randomized trial (NORTHSTAR)
Anna Zumbansen1, Sandra E Black2, Joyce L Chen3
1Jewish General Hospital, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.
European Stroke Journal
|February 18, 2021
Summary
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improved naming in post-stroke aphasia patients with intact Broca's areas. This non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approach showed delayed benefits for speech recovery.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neurology
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Post-stroke aphasia recovery can be enhanced by non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) combined with speech therapy.
- This study investigated the efficacy of 1 Hz subthreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and 2 mA cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on the right pars triangularis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of rTMS and ctDCS as adjunctive therapies for subacute post-stroke aphasia.
- To determine if NIBS influences naming, semantic fluency, and comprehension recovery.
Main Methods:
- A three-armed, sham-controlled, blinded, prospective study involving 63 patients with left middle cerebral artery infarcts.
- Patients received 10 days of rTMS, ctDCS, or sham stimulation alongside speech therapy (ST).
- Primary outcomes included Z-score changes in naming, fluency, and comprehension; secondary outcome was the Unified Aphasia Score (UnAS) change.
Main Results:
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) significantly improved naming at 30 days post-treatment compared to ctDCS and sham stimulation (p=0.01).
- This naming improvement with rTMS was primarily observed in patients with an intact Broca's area.
- No significant differences were found for other primary outcomes; trends suggested potential benefits of NIBS in patients with intact Broca's areas for UnAS.
Conclusions:
- Low-frequency rTMS targeting the right pars triangularis demonstrated a delayed positive effect on naming recovery in subacute post-stroke aphasia.
- The findings suggest that NIBS may be most beneficial for naming recovery in patients whose Broca's area remains morphologically intact post-stroke.
Keywords:
Aphasialanguage therapyrandomized control trialspeech therapystroketranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation
