Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

828
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
828
Information Processing Approach01:30

Information Processing Approach

297
The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is...
297
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

288
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
288
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory01:26

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

1.7K
Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or...
1.7K
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

5.1K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
5.1K
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory01:14

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

764
The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the...
764

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Daytime sleep following observational practice does not enhance a visual-spatial and a motor representation.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Dual-Task and Single-Task Practice Does Not Influence the Attentional Demands of Movement Sequence Representations.

Journal of motor behavior·2024
Same author

Across-task binding: The development of a representation in learning a continuous movement sequence.

Human movement science·2024
Same author

Motor Transfer and Proactive Interference in Cycling With a Noncircular Chainring.

Motor control·2023
Same author

Attentional Demand of a Movement Sequence Guided by Visual-Spatial and by Motor Representations.

Journal of motor behavior·2022
Same author

Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis.

Experimental brain research·2021
Same journal

Orthographic Neighbourhood Size Effects in Chinese Character Recognition: Small, Inconsistent, and Theoretically Ambiguous.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

The Role of Different Thoughts in Tacit Coordination and Its Malleability by Interventions.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Prior Beliefs about Volatility on Adaptive Behavior.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Proactive Control of Emotional Information in Adult ADHD.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowledge Gap Illustrations Spark Curiosity.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Centre-of-Mass Confounds Contribute to Familiar Size Stroop Effects with Boger and Firestone's 'Visual Anagrams'.

Journal of cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.8K

Movement Sequence Learning: Cognitive Processing Demands to Develop a Response Structure.

Christina Pfeifer1, Julia Harenz1, Charles H Shea2

  • 1Saarland University, Im Stadtwald B8.2, D-66041 Saarbrücken, Germany.

Journal of Cognition
|February 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Performing a dual-task did not disrupt a learned 16-element movement sequence. This suggests that complex motor sequences are robust against interference from secondary reaction time tasks.

Keywords:
Cognitive ControlLearningResponse speed

More Related Videos

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

5.0K
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

34.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.8K
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

5.0K
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

34.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Motor sequence learning is crucial for skilled movements.
  • Understanding how cognitive load affects motor performance is important for various applications.
  • Dual-task paradigms are commonly used to assess cognitive resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of a dual-task on the performance of a learned 16-element movement sequence.
  • To determine if a secondary reaction time task interferes with the execution of a complex motor sequence.
  • To examine the stability of the response structure during dual-task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Participants learned a 16-element horizontal lever movement sequence.
  • Sequence performance was assessed under single-task and dual-task conditions on a separate day.
  • The dual-task involved a simple reaction time component integrated into the movement sequence.

Main Results:

  • Participants improved performance of the movement sequence with practice during the acquisition phase.
  • Performance of the learned sequence was not significantly impaired by the dual-task condition.
  • The response structure of the motor sequence remained stable despite the concurrent reaction time task.

Conclusions:

  • Learned complex motor sequences demonstrate resilience to interference from secondary tasks.
  • The findings support the hypothesis of an abstract representation underlying motor sequence execution.
  • Motor sequence performance appears to be a stable process, even under dual-task demands.