Comparison of cost and resource utilization between firearm injuries and motor vehicle collisions at pediatric

Kiesha Fraser Doh1,2, Erica Sheline3, Martha Wetzel4

  • 1Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Insights

Firearm injuries are a leading cause of death for US children, costing nearly five times more in hospital care than motor vehicle collisions. This highlights the need for increased focus and funding on firearm injury prevention strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Health
  • Injury Prevention
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Firearm injuries are a leading cause of death for children in the US, rivaling motor vehicle collisions.
  • Understanding the economic and resource implications of firearm injuries is critical for public health.
  • This study compares healthcare costs and resource use for pediatric firearm injuries versus motor vehicle collisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare hospital costs and resource utilization between children with firearm injuries and those with motor vehicle collisions.
  • To identify key differences in healthcare resource allocation for these two injury types.
  • To inform policy and funding decisions for injury prevention.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric patients (0-19 years) from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017.
  • Data from 35 freestanding children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System.
  • Analysis using generalized linear mixed models to compare costs and resource utilization, adjusting for patient and hospital factors.

Main Results:

  • Firearm-injured youth had significantly higher hospitalization rates (49% vs. 14%) and intensive care unit admissions compared to motor vehicle collision-injured youth.
  • Patients with firearm injuries experienced longer hospital stays and more frequent emergency department visits and readmissions.
  • Mean per-patient hospital costs were nearly fivefold higher for firearm-injured children compared to those with motor vehicle collisions.

Conclusions:

  • Hospital costs and resource utilization are substantially higher for pediatric firearm injuries than for motor vehicle collisions.
  • The high medical resource burden associated with firearm injuries underscores the need for comparable national attention and funding for prevention.
  • Investing in firearm injury prevention is crucial to mitigate significant healthcare costs and improve child safety.
Abstract