Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning
Published on: November 19, 2018
Wide and deep learning for automatic cell type identification
Christopher M Wilson1, Brooke L Fridley1, José R Conejo-Garcia2
1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
None:
Cell type classification is an important problem in cancer research, especially with the advent of single cell technologies. Correctly identifying cells within the tumor microenvironment can provide oncologists with a snapshot of how a patient's immune system reacts to the tumor. Wide and deep learning (WDL) is an approach to construct a cell-classification prediction model that can learn patterns within high-dimensional data (deep) and ensure that biologically relevant features (wide) remain in the final model. In this paper, we demonstrate that regularization can prevent overfitting and adding a wide component to a neural network can result in a model with better predictive performance. In particular, we observed that a combination of dropout and regularization can lead to a validation loss function that does not depend on the number of training iterations and does not experience a significant decrease in prediction accuracy compared to models with , dropout, or no regularization. Additionally, we show WDL can have superior classification accuracy when the training and testing of a model are completed data on that arise from the same cancer type but different platforms. More specifically, WDL compared to traditional deep learning models can substantially increase the overall cell type prediction accuracy (36.5 to 86.9%) and T cell subtypes (CD4: 2.4 to 59.1%, and CD8: 19.5 to 96.1%) when the models were trained using melanoma data obtained from the 10X platform and tested on basal cell carcinoma data obtained using SMART-seq. WDL obtains higher accuracy when compared to state-of-the-art cell classification algorithms CHETAH (70.36%) and SingleR (70.59%).

