Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Don't rock the boat! Do men prefer women leaders who support the status quo?

The British journal of social psychology·2026

Same author

Understanding sustainable cooperation.

Theory and society·2025

Same author

How the country of education affects migrant doctors' acceptance among their patients.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025

Same author

Organizational responses to whistleblowers: How to overcome willful ignorance relating to social identity processes in organizations.

Current opinion in psychology·2025

Same author

Protecting Public Goods or Helping Free Riders? A Real-Life Moral Dilemma in Interethnic and Intraethnic Encounters.

Psychological science·2025

Same author

Do not blame 'queen bees' for gender inequality in academia.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Science as collaborative knowledge generation.

Naomi Ellemers¹

¹Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

The British Journal of Social Psychology

|February 22, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Academic institutions often prioritize competition over collaboration, hindering scientific progress and researcher well-being. A cultural shift towards cooperation is essential for effective knowledge generation and addressing global challenges.

Keywords:

COVID‐19 DORA academic incentives competition in science crisis in psychology instrumental climate open science framework perverse incentives replicability research excellence

More Related Videos

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Published on: July 21, 2021

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Published on: July 21, 2021

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

Area of Science:

Social and organizational psychology
Academic culture studies

Background:

Global challenges like COVID-19 highlight the need for scientific cooperation.
Current academic reward structures heavily emphasize competition among researchers.
This competitive environment is deeply ingrained in institutional culture.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the impact of academic competition on scientific collaboration.
To identify psychological mechanisms that undermine cooperative knowledge generation.
To advocate for a cultural shift in academia towards more collaborative practices.

Main Methods:

Analysis of existing literature on academic culture and psychology.
Examination of the effects of competition-driven incentives.
Review of insights from social and organizational psychology.

Main Results:

Overreliance on competition hinders cooperative exchanges and reduces insight quality.
Competitive models negatively impact researcher well-being and productivity.
Existing incentive structures can inadvertently undermine collaborative efforts.

Conclusions:

A fundamental change in academic culture is necessary.
Shifting from a purely competitive to a more collaborative model is crucial.
This change will better support cumulative knowledge generation and address global issues.