Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

12.1K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.1K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.8K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.8K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.2K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.2K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.7K
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects01:29

Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

132
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
132
Standard Deviation01:10

Standard Deviation

25.1K
The most commonly used measure of variation is the standard deviation. It is a numerical value measuring how far data values are from their mean. The standard deviation value is small when the data are concentrated close to the mean, exhibiting slight variation or spread. The standard deviation value is never negative, it is either positive or zero. The standard deviation is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean, which means the data values are exhibiting more variation.
25.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of the Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (PRETREAT) Score.

Annals of surgery·2025
Same author

Differential MYC Phosphorylation Drives the Divergent Cholangiocyte Response to Stress.

Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology·2025
Same author

Deep learning-based uncertainty quantification for quality assurance in hepatobiliary imaging-based techniques.

Oncotarget·2025
Same author

Deep learning analysis of MRI accurately detects early-stage perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2025
Same author

The dynamic landscape of cholestatic liver disease.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2025
Same author

Aptamer-directed, nanovesicle-mediated targeting of undruggable molecules in preclinical cholangiocarcinoma models.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2025
Same journal

Decoding fibrosis: Transcriptomic and clinical insights via AI-derived collagen deposition phenotypes in MASLD.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
Same journal

A randomized controlled trial of stepped treatment to reduce unhealthy alcohol use in patients with chronic liver disease.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
Same journal

AASLD AST NASPGHAN Practice Guideline on pediatric liver transplantation: Candidate evaluation.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
Same journal

H4K12 lactylation drives TREM2high macrophages differentiation in liver fibrosis.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Good vibrations: Using VCTE to predict hepatic decompensation in MASLD.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
Same journal

One size does not fit all: Global variability in noninvasive testing for MASLD.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

941

The Difference a Decade Makes

Gregory J Gores1,2, Mark A McNiven2,3, Lewis R Roberts1

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
|February 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

No abstract available in PubMed .

More Related Videos

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

2.9K
Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
08:25

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly

Published on: March 11, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

941
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

2.9K
Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
08:25

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly

Published on: March 11, 2022

3.0K