Twenty-four-hour patterns in electrodermal activity recordings of patients with and without epileptic seizures
Solveig Vieluf1,2, Marta Amengual-Gual1, Bo Zhang3
1Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Objective:
Daytime and nighttime patterns affect the dynamic modulation of brain and body functions and influence the autonomic nervous system response to seizures. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate 24-hour patterns of electrodermal activity (EDA) in patients with and without seizures.
Methods:
We included pediatric patients with (a) seizures (SZ), including focal impaired awareness seizures (FIAS) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), (b) no seizures and normal electroencephalography (NEEG), or (c) no seizures but epileptiform activity in the EEG (EA) during vEEG monitoring. Patients wore a device that continuously recorded EDA and temperature (TEMP). EDA levels, EDA spectral power, and TEMP levels were analyzed. To investigate 24-hour patterns, we performed a nonlinear mixed-effects model analysis. Relative mean pre-ictal (-30 min to seizure onset) and post-ictal (I: 30 min after seizure offset; II: 30 to 60 min after seizure offset) values were compared for SZ subgroups.
Results:
We included 119 patients (40 SZ, 17 NEEG, 62 EA). EDA level and power group-specific models (SZ, NEEG, EA) (h = 1; P < .01) were superior to the all-patient cohort model. Fifty-nine seizures were analyzed. Pre-ictal EDA values were lower than respective 24-hour modulated SZ group values. Post hoc comparisons following the period-by-seizure type interaction (EDA level: = 18.50; P < .001, and power: = 6.73; P = .035) revealed that EDA levels were higher in the post-ictal period I for FIAS and GTCS and in post-ictal period II for GTCS only compared to the pre-ictal period.
Significance:
Continuously monitored EDA shows a pattern of change over 24 hours. Curve amplitudes in patients with recorded seizures were lower as compared to patients who did not exhibit seizures during the recording period. Sympathetic skin responses were greater and more prolonged in GTCS compared to FIAS. EDA recordings from wearable devices offer a noninvasive tool to continuously monitor sympathetic activity with potential applications for seizure detection, prediction, and potentially sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) risk estimation.
More Related Videos
05:58Application of an Amplitude-integrated EEG Monitor Cerebral Function Monitor to Neonates
Published on: September 6, 2017
06:28Author Spotlight: Unraveling Seizure Dynamics and Novel Therapeutics for Status Epilepticus Using CMOS High-Density Microelectrode Array Systems
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Epilepsy and Seizures: Overview
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...
Brain Waves
