Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
9.1K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.5K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.5K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

8.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.5K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

9.8K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
9.8K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

8.3K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
8.3K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.7K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

To interact or not to interact: The pros and cons of including interactions in linear regression models.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Penalized optimal scaling for ordinal variables with an application to international classification of functioning core sets.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2023
Same author

With Bayesian estimation one can get all that Bayes factors offer, and more.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

On the white, the black, and the many shades of gray in between: Our reply to Van Ravenzwaaij and Wagenmakers (2021).

Psychological methods·2022
Same author

A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research.

Psychological methods·2022
Same author

A New Opinion Polarization Index Developed by Integrating Expert Judgments.

Frontiers in psychology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Bootstrap confidence intervals for principal covariates regression.

Paolo Giordani1, Henk A L Kiers2

  • 1Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
|February 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces bootstrap methods for estimating statistical uncertainties in Principal Covariate Regression (PCOVR). The findings show these methods offer appropriate statistical behavior for PCOVR parameter estimates.

Keywords:
bootstrapconfidence intervalsprincipal covariate regression

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Multivariate Analysis

Background:

  • Principal Covariate Regression (PCOVR) addresses challenges with numerous or collinear predictor variables.
  • Estimating statistical uncertainties for PCOVR parameter estimates has been an unmet need.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate methods for estimating statistical uncertainties in PCOVR parameter estimates.
  • To assess the performance of bootstrap-based confidence interval strategies.

Main Methods:

  • The bootstrap approach was employed to estimate statistical uncertainties.
  • Four distinct strategies for bootstrap confidence intervals were derived and tested.
  • Simulation experiments were conducted to assess coverage properties.
  • Varimax and quartimin procedures, along with Procrustes rotations, were utilized.

Main Results:

  • The proposed bootstrap strategies generally demonstrated appropriate statistical behavior.
  • Confidence interval coverage approached desired levels as sample sizes increased.
  • Strategies using the quartimin procedure showed limitations with complex component structures.
  • Accurate component extraction improved the statistical behavior of the strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Bootstrap methods provide a viable approach for estimating PCOVR parameter uncertainties.
  • The choice of procedure (varimax vs. quartimin) and component number impacts performance.
  • Further refinement may be needed for complex data structures.