Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction Assessed by 3D Echocardiography in COVID-19 Patients
Yanting Zhang1,2,3, Wei Sun1,2,3, Chun Wu1,2,3
1Department of Ultrasound, Tongji Medical College, Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Insights
Three-dimensional right ventricular ejection fraction (3D-RVEF) is a strong predictor of mortality in COVID-19 patients. This measurement offers superior prognostic value compared to conventional right ventricular function parameters, aiding in risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) assessed by 3D echocardiography (3DE) is crucial for evaluating right ventricular (RV) function and prognosis in cardiovascular diseases.
- The prognostic significance of 3D-RVEF in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not been established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if 3D-RVEF can predict mortality in COVID-19 patients.
- To compare the prognostic value of 3D-RVEF with conventional RV function parameters and RV free wall longitudinal strain (FWLS).
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 128 COVID-19 patients and 31 healthy controls underwent echocardiography.
- Patients were categorized into general, severe, and critical subgroups based on illness severity.
- Measurements included conventional RV parameters, 2D-RVFWLS, and 3D-RVEF.
Main Results:
- COVID-19 patients exhibited significantly decreased 2D-RVFWLS and 3D-RVEF compared to controls.
- Critical patients showed worse RV function, larger right-heart chambers, and a higher incidence of acute cardiac injury and ARDS.
- Multivariate analysis identified 3D-RVEF as the most robust independent predictor of mortality, surpassing RVFAC and 2D-RVFWLS in predictive value.
Conclusions:
- 3D-RVEF is a powerful independent predictor of mortality in COVID-19 patients.
- 3D-RVEF offers superior prognostic value over conventional RV function parameters and 2D-RVFWLS.
- This finding can assist in identifying COVID-19 patients at high risk of death.
Abstract:
Background: RVEF (right ventricular ejection fraction) measured by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) has been used in evaluating right ventricular (RV) function and can provide useful prognostic information in other various cardiovascular diseases. However, the prognostic value of 3D-RVEF in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. We aimed to investigate whether 3D-RVEF can predict the mortality of COVID-19 patients. Methods: A cohort of 128 COVID-19-confirmed patients who had undergone echocardiography were studied. Thirty-one healthy volunteers were also enrolled as controls. COVID-19 patients were divided into three subgroups (general, severe, and critical) according to COVID-19 severity-of-illness. Conventional RV structure and function parameters, RV free wall longitudinal strain (FWLS) and 3D-RVEF were acquired. RVFWLS was measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. RVEF was acquired by 3DE. Results: Compared with controls, 2D-RVFWLS and 3D-RVEF were both significantly decreased in COVID-19 patients (-27.2 ± 4.4% vs. -22.9 ± 4.8%, P < 0.001; 53.7 ± 4.5% vs. 48.5 ± 5.8%, P < 0.001). Critical patients were more likely to have a higher incidence of acute cardiac injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and worse prognosis than general and severe patients. The critical patients exhibited larger right-heart chambers, worse RV fractional area change (RVFAC), 2D-RVFWLS, and 3D-RVEF and higher proportion of pulmonary hypertension than general and severe patients. Eighteen patients died during a median follow-up of 91 days. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed the acute cardiac injury, ARDS, RVFAC, RVFWLS, and 3D-RVEF were independent predictors of death. 3D-RVEF (chi-square to improve 18.3; P < 0.001), RVFAC (chi-square to improve 4.5; P = 0.034) and 2D-RVFWLS (chi-square to improve 5.1; P = 0.024) all provided additional prognostic value of higher mortality over clinical risk factors. Moreover, the incremental predictive value of 3D-RVEF was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than RVFAC and RVFWLS. Conclusion: 3D-RVEF was the most robust independent predictor of mortality in COVID-19 patients and provided a higher predictive value over conventional RV function parameters and RVFWLS, which may be helpful to identify COVID-19 patients at a higher risk of death.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

