Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Light Acquisition02:16

Light Acquisition

8.9K
In order to produce glucose, plants need to capture sufficient light energy. Many modern plants have evolved leaves specialized for light acquisition. Leaves can be only millimeters in width or tens of meters wide, depending on the environment. Due to competition for sunlight, evolution has driven the evolution of increasingly larger leaves and taller plants, to avoid shading by their neighbors with contaminant elaboration of root architecture and mechanisms to transport water and nutrients.
8.9K
Flame Photometry: Lab01:16

Flame Photometry: Lab

593
In a flame photometer, when a solution like potassium chloride is aspirated into the flame, the solvent evaporates, leaving behind dehydrated salt. This salt dissociates into free gaseous atoms in their ground state. Some of these atoms absorb energy from the flame, leading to their excitation. The excited atoms return to the ground state, emitting photons at characteristic wavelengths. Because only electronic transitions are involved, the resulting emission lines are very narrow. The intensity...
593
Flame Photometry: Overview01:02

Flame Photometry: Overview

1.1K
Flame photometry, also known as flame emission spectrometry, is a technique used for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of elements present in a sample using a flame as the source of excitation energy. The concept of flame photometry was realized in the early 1860s by Kirchhoff and Bunsen, who discovered that specific elements emit characteristic radiation when excited in flames. The first instrument developed for this purpose was used to measure sodium (Na) in plant ash using a Bunsen...
1.1K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.7K
Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light02:00

Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light

27.7K
Light plays a significant role in regulating the growth and development of plants. In addition to providing energy for photosynthesis, light provides other important cues to regulate a range of developmental and physiological responses in plants.
27.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

49.1K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
49.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eyes on the Journal: how curiosity shaped a career in clinical research.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2025
Same author

Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses in UK children: Outcomes from a 2-year multi-site interventional trial.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same author

IMI-Interventions for Controlling Myopia Onset and Progression 2025.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025
Same author

Multicenter evaluation of the color vision screener test.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2025
Same author

Color screening outcomes on uncalibrated "home" displays-assessment of variability in sRGB color standard parameters on commercial visual displays.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2025
Same author

Letter to the editor: Seeing the evidence for myopia control interventions: Looking through the lens of a Cochrane living systematic review.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger
05:50

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger

Published on: January 16, 2020

6.0K

Intra- and Inter-Model Variability of Light Detection Using a Commercially Available Light Sensor.

Manbir Nagra1, Marisa Rodriguez-Carmona2, Shelley Blane3

  • 1Vision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK. nagra.manbirk@gmail.com.

Journal of Medical Systems
|February 27, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Researchers must use caution with light sensor devices, as significant variability exists between and within devices. This impacts the accuracy of photobiology and vision research data.

Keywords:
Health technologyMyopiaPhotobiologyWearable electronic devices

More Related Videos

Light Spot-Based Assay for Analysis of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis
07:16

Light Spot-Based Assay for Analysis of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.5K
A Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy Assay of Protein-Protein Interactions at Cell-Cell Contacts
08:43

A Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy Assay of Protein-Protein Interactions at Cell-Cell Contacts

Published on: December 1, 2018

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger
05:50

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger

Published on: January 16, 2020

6.0K
Light Spot-Based Assay for Analysis of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis
07:16

Light Spot-Based Assay for Analysis of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.5K
A Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy Assay of Protein-Protein Interactions at Cell-Cell Contacts
08:43

A Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy Assay of Protein-Protein Interactions at Cell-Cell Contacts

Published on: December 1, 2018

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Optometry and Vision Science
  • Biological Rhythms Research
  • Photobiology

Background:

  • Accurate light measurement is crucial for validating research on light's impact on vision and biological processes.
  • Commercially available light sensors are widely used in photobiological and vision research.
  • Understanding device variability is essential for reliable scientific findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify intra- and inter-watch variability of the Actiwatch Spectrum Pro light sensor.
  • To assess device performance under controlled lighting conditions relevant to vision research.

Main Methods:

  • Four Actiwatch Spectrum Pro devices were tested.
  • Measurements were taken on two occasions under three controlled illuminants: Simulated Daylight (D65), Illuminant A (A), and Cool White Fluorescent (CWF).
  • Variability was analyzed for tricolour (red, green, blue) and white sensor outputs.

Main Results:

  • Significant inter-watch differences were found for tricolour and white sensor outputs across all illuminants (p < 0.01).
  • A significant interaction between sensor type and watch was observed (p < 0.01).
  • Intra-watch differences were noted for most sensor outputs, with one exception under D65 illuminant.

Conclusions:

  • Significant variability exists within and between Actiwatch Spectrum Pro devices, impacting data reliability.
  • Researchers should acknowledge instrument limitations and exercise caution in longitudinal studies.
  • Avoid mixing different devices among participants in light-related research to ensure data consistency.