Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The fastest among us… The unique capacity of self-control of upper alpha brain oscillations for expedited mental rotation by some individuals.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same author

Correction: Applications of Alpha Neurofeedback Processes for Enhanced Mental Manipulation of Unfamiliar Molecular and Spatial Structures.

Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback·2024
Same author

Applications of Alpha Neurofeedback Processes for Enhanced Mental Manipulation of Unfamiliar Molecular and Spatial Structures.

Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback·2024
Same author

Shared mechanisms underlie mental imagery and motor planning.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist).

Brain : a journal of neurology·2020
Same author

How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.1K

Neural Signatures of Interface Errors in Remote Agent Manipulation.

Boris Yazmir1, Miriam Reiner1

  • 1Virtual Reality and Neuro-Cognition Laboratory, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.

Neuroscience
|February 27, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Interface errors in brain-computer interfaces (BCI) can cause sensory conflicts. This study identifies distinct electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns for congruent versus incongruent feedback errors, impacting user response time.

Keywords:
brain computer interface (BCI)electroencephalogram (EEG)error related potentials (ErrP)event related potentials (ERP)hapticsvirtual reality

More Related Videos

Mechanical Manipulation of Neurons to Control Axonal Development
10:02

Mechanical Manipulation of Neurons to Control Axonal Development

Published on: April 10, 2011

10.7K
The Muscle Cuff Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for the Amplification of Intact Peripheral Nerve Signals
07:30

The Muscle Cuff Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for the Amplification of Intact Peripheral Nerve Signals

Published on: January 13, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.1K
Mechanical Manipulation of Neurons to Control Axonal Development
10:02

Mechanical Manipulation of Neurons to Control Axonal Development

Published on: April 10, 2011

10.7K
The Muscle Cuff Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for the Amplification of Intact Peripheral Nerve Signals
07:30

The Muscle Cuff Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for the Amplification of Intact Peripheral Nerve Signals

Published on: January 13, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Remote agent manipulation (e.g., robotic surgery, BCI-wheelchair control) is susceptible to errors from user intent misclassification or system malfunctions.
  • Errors can arise from unpredicted interface movements that violate user intent, leading to sensory conflicts and incorrect actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify electroencephalogram (EEG) error signals associated with interface errors where visual and proprioceptive feedback are either congruent or incongruent.
  • To examine the effects of these congruent and incongruent sensory stimuli on user responses and cognitive processing.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded EEG data during two types of interface errors (congruent and incongruent feedback) within a 3D virtual game environment.
  • Analyzed EEG potentials for differences in profile, latencies, scalp distribution, and sources.
  • Investigated time-frequency characteristics of EEG signals and assessed Stroop effect and user response times.

Main Results:

  • Significant and marginally significant differences in EEG potentials were observed between congruent and incongruent interface errors.
  • Distinct EEG signal characteristics were elicited by incongruent visuo-haptic feedback.
  • Incongruency in feedback modalities led to a delayed user response and a marginally significant Stroop effect.

Conclusions:

  • Interface errors involving incongruent sensory feedback generate unique EEG signatures.
  • Visuo-haptic incongruency delays user response time, a critical factor for designing effective human-computer interfaces.
  • Understanding these EEG error patterns can inform the design of more intuitive and responsive control systems.